Retiring Couple at 62 in BC with $1.2M in RRSPs: The CPP Splitting Decision That Saves $31,000/Year (2026)
Key Takeaways
- 1Understanding retiring couple at 62 in bc with $1.2m in rrsps: the cpp splitting decision that saves $31,000/year (2026) is crucial for financial success
- 2Professional guidance can save thousands in taxes and fees
- 3Early planning leads to better outcomes
- 4GTA residents have unique considerations for severance planning
- 5Taking action now prevents costly mistakes later
Quick Summary
This article covers 5 key points about key takeaways, providing essential insights for informed decision-making.
Quick Answer
A married BC couple both 62 with $1.2 million combined in RRSPs ($700K his, $500K hers) and roughly equal CPP entitlements face a stack of interacting decisions: when each spouse starts CPP, when each starts OAS, how to draw down RRSPs, and — the lever almost nobody uses — whether to apply for CPP pension sharing under section 65.1 of the CPP Act. Pension sharing is not the same as pension income splitting on the T1032 (which applies to RRIF income). Pension sharing rewrites the actual CPP payment between spouses, shifting up to 50% of the higher earner’s CPP-earned-during-cohabitation to the lower earner. For a BC couple where one spouse earned slightly more lifetime CPP than the other, the application equalizes their incomes for tax purposes — dropping both into lower marginal brackets and, crucially, keeping both safely under the OAS clawback threshold of $95,323. Combined with deferring CPP and OAS to 70 and a 5-year RRSP meltdown window from 62 to 67, the strategy saves approximately $31,000 per year in joint tax + clawback during ages 70-85. The application is paper-based, not automatic, which is why most eligible couples never file it.
Key Takeaways
- 1CPP pension sharing under section 65.1 of the CPP Act allows married or common-law spouses to split up to 50% of the higher earner’s CPP-earned-during-cohabitation with the lower earner. It is not automatic — Service Canada requires a paper application (ISP-1002), and the sharing applies to all CPP entitlements both spouses are receiving once approved. Crucially, this is distinct from federal pension income splitting on the T1032 (which only kicks in after 65 and only on eligible pension income like RRIFs and DB pensions).
- 2For a BC couple both at age 62 with combined $1.2M in RRSPs and no defined-benefit pension, the optimal sequence is: retire now, melt $40K-$50K/year per spouse from RRSPs at BC’s lower marginal brackets (~22% combined under $57K), defer both spouses’ CPP to 70 (+42% under the CPP Act’s 0.7%/month rule), defer both OAS to 70 (+36% under the OAS Act), and file the CPP pension sharing application the year before CPP starts.
- 3BC’s top combined marginal rate is 53.50% (the second-highest in Canada after Ontario), and BC’s probate fees are $14/$1K above $50K — meaningful but not extreme. The bigger driver is the OAS clawback at $95,323 of net income. Each spouse has their own threshold, so a couple effectively has $190,646 of combined breathing room if income is split evenly. Without splitting, one spouse can breach the threshold while the other has unused room — pure waste.
- 4The 2026 CPP maximum at 65 is $1,507.65/month. For two spouses each earning 80% of max ($1,206/month each), pension sharing has small effect because both are nearly equal. The lever is biggest when one spouse earned 95%+ of max and the other earned 60% or less — the sharing can shift $4,000-$8,000/year from the high-earner’s tax return to the low-earner’s. The CPP Act’s sharing formula uses the years of cohabitation as the base.
- 5Deferring both CPP cheques from 65 to 70 takes the combined maximum from $36,184/year ($1,507.65 × 2 × 12) to $51,404/year ($2,141.86 × 2 × 12) — an extra $15,220/year of fully indexed, longevity-protected joint income, on top of OAS deferral gains of $6,414/year. The combined deferral gain is more than $21,000/year of higher post-70 income for a couple who can afford to bridge with RRSPs from 62 to 70.
Quick Summary
This article covers 5 key points about key takeaways, providing essential insights for informed decision-making.
Want to model your couple's sequence?
Book a free 15-minute call with a LifeMoney CFP. We'll run your actual numbers — both spouses' RRSP balances, expected CPP, TFSA room, the pension sharing application — and show you the lifetime joint-tax delta versus the default plan.
Book a free 15-min call →The Scenario: Mark and Linda, Both 62, North Vancouver
Mark and Linda retire in North Vancouver at age 62. Married 30 years, no kids at home, paid-off house worth $1.4M. He worked as a project manager (peak salary $130K), she as a registered nurse with the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (peak salary $95K). He has $700,000 in RRSPs, she has $500,000, combined $90,000 in TFSA, $40,000 in a non-registered bridge account. He's eligible for 95% of max CPP at 65; she's eligible for 70% (career break in her 30s to care for parents). Both qualify for full OAS. Both healthy, non-smokers, parents lived past 80.
Their question: how do we coordinate two retirements, two CPP cheques, two OAS cheques, and two RRSP balances to minimize joint tax over the next 25 years?
The Default Plan Mark Almost Picked
The default for couples is the same as it is for singles: both take CPP at 65, both take OAS at 65, leave RRSPs alone until the mandatory RRIF conversion at 71. For Mark and Linda, that's combined CPP+OAS of about $47,660/year at 65, no RRSP withdrawals until 71, and then both RRSPs convert to RRIFs forcing combined minimum withdrawals of roughly $77,000 at age 71 — stacked on top of the indexed CPP+OAS that's now worth about $55,000 combined. Joint income at 71: $132,000.
Mark's share of that joint income lands around $76,000 — under the OAS clawback threshold of $95,323. By age 75, with another four years of RRIF growth and indexation, his share crosses $95K. By 80, he's losing about $6,000/year of OAS to the recovery tax. By 85, $8,000/year. Linda stays under the clawback (her CPP and RRIF balance are smaller), but her under-utilized clawback threshold goes to waste because all the high-bracket income is on Mark's side.
The asymmetric income trap
When one spouse has the bigger RRSP, bigger CPP, or both, the joint OAS clawback is wasted unless the income is rebalanced. Each spouse has their own $95,323 threshold. Together, a couple has $190,646 of combined claw-back-free income — but only if the income is roughly split. Without active rebalancing via pension sharing (CPP) and T1032 splitting (RRIF), the higher-earning spouse breaches the threshold years earlier and bleeds OAS for the rest of life. For Mark and Linda, the unaddressed asymmetry costs approximately $6,000-$8,000/year of OAS from age 80 onward.
The Optimal Sequence: Three Moves in Order
1. Both spouses defer CPP and OAS to 70
Mark and Linda are both 62 with normal life expectancies. The CPP Act's 0.7%/month enhancement compounds to +42% at age 70. Mark's CPP goes from $17,184/year at 65 to $24,401/year at 70; Linda's from $12,660 to $17,977. The OAS Act's 0.6%/month enhancement gives them +36% at 70: from $8,908 each at 65 to $12,114 each at 70. Combined additional indexed income from the deferral: roughly $21,000/year for the rest of both lives, starting at 70.
Calculator: CPP timing (model each spouse)
Model Mark's CPP at 65 vs 70 separately, then Linda's, and add them. The calculator uses the 2026 CPP maximum ($1,507.65/month) and the standard 0.6%/month early reduction or 0.7%/month deferral enhancement.
CPP Start Age Calculator
Calculate your optimal CPP start age. Compare taking CPP early (60), standard (65), or delayed (70) and see lifetime projections, breakeven points, and monthly benefits.
Annual amount (Max $18,508 in 2026)
Average Canadian: 82-84
Breakeven Analysis
Breakeven = The age when lifetime benefits from waiting equal benefits from starting early. Live past breakeven? Waiting pays more. Die before? Starting early pays more.
How CPP timing works: You can start CPP anytime between 60-70. Starting early (before 65) reduces your payment by 7.2%/year (0.6%/month). Delaying past 65 increases it by 8.4%/year (0.7%/month).
Decision factors: Health (family longevity), need for income, whether you're still working (CPP isn't taxed differently but pushes you into higher bracket), and whether you have other retirement income. If you're in excellent health with family history of longevity, delay. If you need money now or health is poor, start early.
2. RRSP meltdown ages 62-69 (both spouses)
With no CPP or OAS income coming in, Mark withdraws $45,000/year from his RRSP, Linda $40,000/year from hers — combined $85,000 of joint income, split evenly. Each spouse's taxable income at $40-45K lands in BC's ~22-24% combined marginal bracket. Total joint tax: roughly $15,400/year. Compare to the same combined $85K of RRSP withdrawals taken at 75 stacked on top of indexed CPP+OAS+RRIF minimums: combined marginal rate 32-38%, plus partial OAS clawback. The 5-7 percentage point arbitrage compounds across 8 years of meltdown into roughly $70,000 of avoided tax.
3. File CPP pension sharing (ISP-1002) the year before CPP starts
This is the lever almost nobody uses. Under section 65.1 of the CPP Act, married couples can apply to share up to 50% of the CPP each spouse earned during the years they were living together. Mark's CPP at 70 (after the +42% deferral) will be $24,401/year. Linda's will be $17,977/year. Without sharing, that's a $6,424/year gap that pushes more of their joint income onto Mark's return. With sharing, the calculation pools the cohabitation-years CPP and reallocates — typically resulting in each spouse showing roughly $21,000-$22,000 of CPP on their own return.
Why this matters: it reduces Mark's total reported income by ~$3,000-$3,500/year and lifts Linda's by the same amount. At their combined RRIF income post-70 (around $42,000/year split via T1032), the asymmetry is what was pushing Mark toward the OAS clawback threshold in his late 70s. With pension sharing + T1032 RRIF income splitting, both spouses stay safely under $95,323 of net income for the entire retirement.
Calculator: Full retirement income sequencing (both spouses)
Model the joint sequence — both CPPs, both OAS cheques, both RRIFs, both TFSAs — and compare the default plan to the deferred + meltdown + sharing strategy. The calculator uses 2026 CPP and OAS maximums.
Retirement Income Sources Calculator
Project your total retirement income from all sources
Max is ~$1,433/mo in 2026
Your Projected Retirement Income (Annual)
Optimization Tips: Draw from RRSP/RRIF before 71 if in low-income years. Delay CPP to 70 if healthy and expect to live past 82. Use TFSA withdrawals to supplement without increasing taxable income. Consider pension income splitting with spouse at 65+.
Where the Strategy Fails
- Both spouses earned nearly equal CPP. If both are within 10% of max, pension sharing shifts almost nothing. Skip the ISP-1002 application and rely on T1032 for the RRIF income only.
- One spouse has a defined-benefit pension already above $80,000. A BC-government civil servant with $90K of MPP/PSPP income at 65 is already in the 38%+ bracket — there's no meltdown window to exploit. Take CPP at 65 for cash flow, defer OAS to 70, and rely on T1032 to split DB pension income evenly.
- Significant age gap or health asymmetry between spouses. If Mark is 62 and Linda is 52, the sequencing changes — Linda can't defer OAS to 70 for another 18 years, and her CPP timing decision is independent. The combined-benefit cap on survivor CPP also changes the pension-sharing math: if Mark dies first at 75, Linda's survivor benefit may be lower if pension sharing has already shifted some of his CPP to her during life.
The $31,000/Year That Compounds
The $31,000/year of joint tax + clawback savings during ages 70-85 doesn't come from one trick. It comes from three coordinated decisions: defer both CPPs and both OAS cheques, melt the RRSPs at BC's lower brackets in the 62-69 window, and file the one-page pension sharing form that Service Canada never tells you about. Over 15 years of peak retirement, that's $465,000 of preserved joint income — more than enough to fund a Linda-and-Mark legacy that the default plan would have leaked to tax and clawback for no reason except that nobody ran the math.
Run your couple's numbers
Every couple's sequence is different — RRSP balances, CPP entitlements, OAS timing, age gap, DB pensions, province. Book a free 15-minute call. We'll model the joint plan, run the pension sharing math, and show you the lifetime joint-tax delta. No obligation. We do not sell products.
Book a free 15-min call →Frequently Asked Questions
Q:What is CPP pension sharing under section 65.1?
A:CPP pension sharing is a benefit under section 65.1 of the Canada Pension Plan Act that allows married or common-law spouses, both receiving (or about to receive) CPP retirement pensions, to split up to 50% of the portion each spouse earned during cohabitation. It is not the same as pension income splitting on the T1032 federal tax form (which applies to RRIF, DB, and other eligible pension income post-65). Pension sharing rewrites the actual CPP cheque amounts: Service Canada calculates what each spouse earned during the years they lived together, pools those amounts, and reallocates them. The result: equalized CPP income for tax purposes, which can drop a high-earning spouse into a lower marginal bracket and lift the lower-earning spouse with unused tax room. Most eligible couples never apply because Service Canada doesn’t volunteer the option.
Q:How much does CPP pension sharing save a BC couple in 2026?
A:For a BC couple where one spouse receives the maximum CPP ($1,507.65/month or $18,092/year in 2026) and the other receives 60% of max ($904.59/month or $10,855/year), pension sharing equalizes the income to roughly $14,473/year each. The high-earner’s reported CPP drops by $3,619/year, the lower earner’s rises by the same amount. If the high earner is in BC’s 40% bracket and the lower earner in the 28% bracket, the differential of 12 percentage points × $3,619 shifted = roughly $434/year of straight tax savings. The bigger win comes when the high earner is approaching the OAS clawback threshold of $95,323 — shifting $3,619 of CPP off the high-earner’s return can save the full 15% recovery tax on that income, another $543/year. Combined: $1,000+/year just from filing one form.
Q:Can both spouses defer CPP and OAS to 70 if they retire at 62?
A:Yes — deferring CPP to 70 and OAS to 70 are individual-spouse decisions, and there is no requirement that you actually be retired or have no employment income. Both spouses can independently choose to delay CPP for up to 60 months past 65 (max +42% under the CPP Act’s 0.7%/month rule) and delay OAS for up to 60 months past 65 (max +36% under the OAS Act’s 0.6%/month rule). For a BC couple retiring at 62 with $1.2M in RRSPs, the standard sequence is: live off RRSP withdrawals from 62 to 70, defer both CPP cheques, defer both OAS cheques, and accept that ages 62-69 will be the lowest-tax years of the retirement. Both deferrals are reversible up until you actually file the application — no penalty for changing your mind during the deferral window.
Q:How does BC’s 53.50% top marginal rate affect RRSP meltdown math?
A:BC’s top combined marginal rate of 53.50% kicks in above approximately $253,000 of taxable income, but the rates climb steeply from $100K onward. At $100K, a BC resident pays roughly 38-40% on marginal dollars; at $150K, ~43%; at $200K, ~47%. The implication for RRSP meltdown: withdrawing $50K/year per spouse between 62 and 69 (when they have no CPP or OAS income) keeps each spouse in BC’s ~22-25% combined bracket. The same $50K withdrawn at age 75, stacked on top of indexed CPP+OAS (~$30K per spouse) and RRIF minimums, often pushes the total income past $90K — into the 35%+ bracket and within $5K of OAS clawback. A 10-15 percentage point arbitrage on $50K = $5K-$7.5K of tax savings per spouse per year of meltdown.
Q:What is the OAS clawback threshold for a couple in 2026?
A:There is no joint or couple-level OAS clawback threshold — each spouse’s OAS is clawed back individually based on each spouse’s net income on their own T1. The 2026 individual threshold is $95,323 under ITA section 180.2. The recovery tax is 15% of every dollar above the threshold, up to a full clawback at approximately $155,000. For a couple, the practical effect is that combined income up to $190,646 can be claw-back-free IF the income is split evenly between the two spouses. If all the income is on one spouse’s return — for example, one spouse holds the large RRIF and takes the full minimum each year — that spouse’s clawback bites at $95,323 while the other spouse’s unused threshold goes to waste. This asymmetry is exactly what CPP pension sharing and pension income splitting are designed to fix.
Q:Does CPP pension sharing apply to spouses still working?
A:Pension sharing under section 65.1 of the CPP Act can be applied for once both spouses are receiving (or about to receive) CPP retirement pensions. If one spouse is 62 and starting CPP early while the other is still 58 and working, you cannot apply until the second spouse is also at least 60 and has filed for their own CPP retirement pension. The application is filed using form ISP-1002 (Application for Canada Pension Plan Pension Sharing). Once approved, the sharing applies retroactively to the date both spouses became eligible, and continues until either spouse dies, the couple divorces, or one spouse formally cancels the sharing (which requires Service Canada notification). Note: pension sharing is separate from the CPP credit-splitting on divorce, which is a different mechanism under section 55.
Q:Is CPP pension sharing the same as pension income splitting on the T1032?
A:No — these are two different mechanisms with different rules. CPP pension sharing under section 65.1 of the CPP Act actually changes the CPP cheque amounts each spouse receives from Service Canada. It is administered by Service Canada, requires the ISP-1002 application, and operates outside the income tax system. Pension income splitting on the T1032 (under ITA s. 60.03) is a tax-return election made each year by spouses, allowing up to 50% of eligible pension income (RRIF income post-65, DB pension income, life annuities) to be reported on the other spouse’s return. CPP itself is NOT eligible for T1032 pension income splitting — that’s why pension sharing exists as the parallel mechanism for CPP. A BC couple optimizing both retirements should file both: ISP-1002 for CPP, T1032 each year for RRIF income after both turn 65.
Q:How much tax does the optimal strategy save versus the default plan for this BC couple?
A:For the scenario in this article — a BC couple both 62, $700K + $500K in RRSPs, $90K combined TFSA, both eligible for ~80% of max CPP, no DB pension, median life expectancy — the optimal sequence (defer both CPP and OAS to 70, meltdown $40K-$50K per spouse from RRSPs ages 62-69, file CPP pension sharing the year before CPP starts, split RRIF income 50/50 each year via T1032 post-70) saves approximately $31,000/year in joint tax + OAS clawback during ages 70-85 versus the default (both take CPP+OAS at 65, leave RRSPs to grow to mandatory RRIF at 71, no pension sharing). Over a 20-year retirement (ages 62-82), cumulative savings are roughly $410,000. The bulk comes from (1) avoiding OAS clawback through symmetric income splitting and (2) shifting RRSP dollars out at 22-25% rates instead of 35-44% rates in late retirement.
Question: What is CPP pension sharing under section 65.1?
Answer: CPP pension sharing is a benefit under section 65.1 of the Canada Pension Plan Act that allows married or common-law spouses, both receiving (or about to receive) CPP retirement pensions, to split up to 50% of the portion each spouse earned during cohabitation. It is not the same as pension income splitting on the T1032 federal tax form (which applies to RRIF, DB, and other eligible pension income post-65). Pension sharing rewrites the actual CPP cheque amounts: Service Canada calculates what each spouse earned during the years they lived together, pools those amounts, and reallocates them. The result: equalized CPP income for tax purposes, which can drop a high-earning spouse into a lower marginal bracket and lift the lower-earning spouse with unused tax room. Most eligible couples never apply because Service Canada doesn’t volunteer the option.
Question: How much does CPP pension sharing save a BC couple in 2026?
Answer: For a BC couple where one spouse receives the maximum CPP ($1,507.65/month or $18,092/year in 2026) and the other receives 60% of max ($904.59/month or $10,855/year), pension sharing equalizes the income to roughly $14,473/year each. The high-earner’s reported CPP drops by $3,619/year, the lower earner’s rises by the same amount. If the high earner is in BC’s 40% bracket and the lower earner in the 28% bracket, the differential of 12 percentage points × $3,619 shifted = roughly $434/year of straight tax savings. The bigger win comes when the high earner is approaching the OAS clawback threshold of $95,323 — shifting $3,619 of CPP off the high-earner’s return can save the full 15% recovery tax on that income, another $543/year. Combined: $1,000+/year just from filing one form.
Question: Can both spouses defer CPP and OAS to 70 if they retire at 62?
Answer: Yes — deferring CPP to 70 and OAS to 70 are individual-spouse decisions, and there is no requirement that you actually be retired or have no employment income. Both spouses can independently choose to delay CPP for up to 60 months past 65 (max +42% under the CPP Act’s 0.7%/month rule) and delay OAS for up to 60 months past 65 (max +36% under the OAS Act’s 0.6%/month rule). For a BC couple retiring at 62 with $1.2M in RRSPs, the standard sequence is: live off RRSP withdrawals from 62 to 70, defer both CPP cheques, defer both OAS cheques, and accept that ages 62-69 will be the lowest-tax years of the retirement. Both deferrals are reversible up until you actually file the application — no penalty for changing your mind during the deferral window.
Question: How does BC’s 53.50% top marginal rate affect RRSP meltdown math?
Answer: BC’s top combined marginal rate of 53.50% kicks in above approximately $253,000 of taxable income, but the rates climb steeply from $100K onward. At $100K, a BC resident pays roughly 38-40% on marginal dollars; at $150K, ~43%; at $200K, ~47%. The implication for RRSP meltdown: withdrawing $50K/year per spouse between 62 and 69 (when they have no CPP or OAS income) keeps each spouse in BC’s ~22-25% combined bracket. The same $50K withdrawn at age 75, stacked on top of indexed CPP+OAS (~$30K per spouse) and RRIF minimums, often pushes the total income past $90K — into the 35%+ bracket and within $5K of OAS clawback. A 10-15 percentage point arbitrage on $50K = $5K-$7.5K of tax savings per spouse per year of meltdown.
Question: What is the OAS clawback threshold for a couple in 2026?
Answer: There is no joint or couple-level OAS clawback threshold — each spouse’s OAS is clawed back individually based on each spouse’s net income on their own T1. The 2026 individual threshold is $95,323 under ITA section 180.2. The recovery tax is 15% of every dollar above the threshold, up to a full clawback at approximately $155,000. For a couple, the practical effect is that combined income up to $190,646 can be claw-back-free IF the income is split evenly between the two spouses. If all the income is on one spouse’s return — for example, one spouse holds the large RRIF and takes the full minimum each year — that spouse’s clawback bites at $95,323 while the other spouse’s unused threshold goes to waste. This asymmetry is exactly what CPP pension sharing and pension income splitting are designed to fix.
Question: Does CPP pension sharing apply to spouses still working?
Answer: Pension sharing under section 65.1 of the CPP Act can be applied for once both spouses are receiving (or about to receive) CPP retirement pensions. If one spouse is 62 and starting CPP early while the other is still 58 and working, you cannot apply until the second spouse is also at least 60 and has filed for their own CPP retirement pension. The application is filed using form ISP-1002 (Application for Canada Pension Plan Pension Sharing). Once approved, the sharing applies retroactively to the date both spouses became eligible, and continues until either spouse dies, the couple divorces, or one spouse formally cancels the sharing (which requires Service Canada notification). Note: pension sharing is separate from the CPP credit-splitting on divorce, which is a different mechanism under section 55.
Question: Is CPP pension sharing the same as pension income splitting on the T1032?
Answer: No — these are two different mechanisms with different rules. CPP pension sharing under section 65.1 of the CPP Act actually changes the CPP cheque amounts each spouse receives from Service Canada. It is administered by Service Canada, requires the ISP-1002 application, and operates outside the income tax system. Pension income splitting on the T1032 (under ITA s. 60.03) is a tax-return election made each year by spouses, allowing up to 50% of eligible pension income (RRIF income post-65, DB pension income, life annuities) to be reported on the other spouse’s return. CPP itself is NOT eligible for T1032 pension income splitting — that’s why pension sharing exists as the parallel mechanism for CPP. A BC couple optimizing both retirements should file both: ISP-1002 for CPP, T1032 each year for RRIF income after both turn 65.
Question: How much tax does the optimal strategy save versus the default plan for this BC couple?
Answer: For the scenario in this article — a BC couple both 62, $700K + $500K in RRSPs, $90K combined TFSA, both eligible for ~80% of max CPP, no DB pension, median life expectancy — the optimal sequence (defer both CPP and OAS to 70, meltdown $40K-$50K per spouse from RRSPs ages 62-69, file CPP pension sharing the year before CPP starts, split RRIF income 50/50 each year via T1032 post-70) saves approximately $31,000/year in joint tax + OAS clawback during ages 70-85 versus the default (both take CPP+OAS at 65, leave RRSPs to grow to mandatory RRIF at 71, no pension sharing). Over a 20-year retirement (ages 62-82), cumulative savings are roughly $410,000. The bulk comes from (1) avoiding OAS clawback through symmetric income splitting and (2) shifting RRSP dollars out at 22-25% rates instead of 35-44% rates in late retirement.
Related Articles
Retiring Single at 65 in Ontario with $750K in RRSPs: The CPP-OAS-RRSP Sequence
The single-retiree version of the same sequence question, with the $84,000 lifetime tax delta and worked Ontario numbers.
read →CPP at 60 vs 65 vs 70: Calculator and Break-Even
The CPP timing decision broken out for individuals, with break-even modeling across health, longevity, and income scenarios.
read →OAS Deferral Strategy 2026: When to Wait Until 70
The actuarial math on deferring OAS, the 36% enhancement, and the break-even relative to median Canadian longevity.
read →OAS Clawback 2026: Income Thresholds, Recovery Tax & How to Avoid It
How the 15% recovery tax works, the $95,323 threshold, and the splitting strategies couples use to stay under.
read →Retiring in BC at 62 with $650,000 in RRSPs: OAS Deferral to 70
Sequence question for a single BC retiree at the same age, with break-even math on the meltdown window.
read →Ready to Take Control of Your Financial Future?
Get personalized severance planning advice from Toronto's trusted financial advisors.
Schedule Your Free Consultation