Common-Law Spouse Inheriting a $1.2M Estate in BC: What CRA Considers a Tax-Free Rollover vs. a Taxable Transfer in 2026
Key Takeaways
- 1Understanding common-law spouse inheriting a $1.2m estate in bc: what cra considers a tax-free rollover vs. a taxable transfer in 2026 is crucial for financial success
- 2Professional guidance can save thousands in taxes and fees
- 3Early planning leads to better outcomes
- 4GTA residents have unique considerations for inheritance planning
- 5Taking action now prevents costly mistakes later
Quick Summary
This article covers 5 key points about key takeaways, providing essential insights for informed decision-making.
Quick Answer
A common-law partner qualifies for the spousal rollover under the Income Tax Act — meaning RRSPs, RRIFs, and capital property can transfer at the deceased's adjusted cost base with no immediate tax — but only if CRA recognizes the relationship. For the general spousal rollover on capital property, the couple must have lived together in a conjugal relationship for at least 12 consecutive months at the time of death. For RRSP/RRIF beneficiary designations, the CRA applies the same 12-month cohabitation test under subsection 146(1) and 248(1). If the relationship does not meet the 12-month threshold — even by a single week — the RRSP is fully included as income on the terminal return under subsection 146(8.8), and all non-registered investments trigger a deemed disposition at fair market value. On a $1.2M BC estate with a $400K RRSP and $800K in property, missing the common-law threshold converts a $0 tax transfer into a bill exceeding $200,000. BC probate fees on $1.2M are approximately $16,450 under the current fee schedule, and WESA (Wills, Estates and Succession Act) does recognize common-law spouses — but only for intestacy purposes after two years of cohabitation, not 12 months.
Key Takeaways
- 1CRA's common-law definition for the spousal rollover requires 12 consecutive months of cohabitation in a conjugal relationship — defined under subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act. This is a federal tax definition that applies across all provinces. If the couple separates for any period and resumes cohabitation, the 12-month clock restarts. The date of death, not the date of the will or beneficiary designation, determines whether the threshold is met.
- 2BC's WESA (Wills, Estates and Succession Act) uses a different definition for common-law spouses in intestacy situations — requiring two years of cohabitation in a 'marriage-like relationship.' This means a couple together for 15 months qualifies for the federal tax rollover but does NOT qualify as a spouse under BC intestacy law. If there is no will, the common-law partner may receive nothing under WESA despite being the CRA-recognized spouse.
- 3The RRSP spousal rollover allows the $400,000 RRSP to transfer directly to the surviving common-law spouse's RRSP or RRIF with zero immediate tax — the income inclusion under subsection 146(8.8) is deferred until the survivor eventually withdraws the funds. Without the rollover, the full $400,000 is added to the deceased's terminal return as ordinary income, generating approximately $190,000–$210,000 in combined federal and BC provincial tax.
- 4Deemed disposition on non-registered investments is automatically deferred when property transfers to a qualifying spouse or common-law partner under subsection 70(6). On $800,000 of property with a $300,000 adjusted cost base, the $500,000 unrealized capital gain triggers $0 tax at death if the rollover applies — but approximately $125,000–$133,000 in capital gains tax if it does not.
- 5BC probate fees on a $1.2M estate are approximately $16,450 — calculated at $6 per $1,000 on estate value between $50,000 and $1.2M, plus $350 on the first $50,000. Assets that pass outside the estate (joint tenancy, beneficiary designations, trusts) are excluded from the probate calculation. The RRSP, if it has a named beneficiary, bypasses probate entirely — reducing the probate base to the non-registered assets only.
- 6If the deceased died intestate (no will) and the common-law relationship was under two years, BC's WESA does not recognize the partner as a spouse for inheritance purposes. The estate passes to the deceased's children, parents, or siblings under the intestacy hierarchy — and the common-law partner receives nothing from the estate itself, even though CRA recognized the relationship for the spousal tax rollover. The tax benefit is useless if you don't inherit the assets.
Quick Summary
This article covers 6 key points about key takeaways, providing essential insights for informed decision-making.
The 12-Month Rule: How CRA Defines a Common-Law Partner for the Spousal Rollover
The spousal rollover is the single most valuable tax provision in Canadian estate planning. It allows RRSPs, RRIFs, and capital property to transfer to a surviving spouse at the deceased's adjusted cost base — deferring all capital gains tax and RRSP income inclusion until the surviving spouse eventually sells the property or withdraws the registered funds. On a $1.2M estate, the rollover can defer $200,000+ in tax.
For legally married couples, the rollover is automatic. For common-law partners, it requires clearing a specific threshold: subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act defines a "common-law partner" as a person who cohabits with the taxpayer in a conjugal relationship and has done so continuously for a period of at least 12 months, or is the parent of a child of the taxpayer. The 12 months must be consecutive and unbroken at the date of death — not cumulative across multiple periods of cohabitation.
What "Conjugal Relationship" Means to CRA
CRA assesses multiple factors to determine whether a conjugal relationship exists: shared shelter (living under the same roof), sexual and personal behaviour, shared finances (joint bank accounts, credit cards, shared expenses), social recognition as a couple, and the presence of children. No single factor is determinative — CRA looks at the totality of the arrangement.
What breaks the 12-month clock: A separation where one partner moves out and the conjugal relationship ends. Temporary absences (business travel, medical stays, family emergencies) do not break continuity if both partners intend to resume cohabitation.
What does NOT qualify: Roommates who share housing costs but do not have a conjugal relationship. Adult children living with a parent. Friends with shared finances but no conjugal bond. The relationship must be "marriage-like" in substance, not merely cohabitative.
BC's WESA vs. CRA: Two Definitions, Two Timelines, One Estate
This is where common-law estate planning in BC becomes genuinely dangerous. The federal Income Tax Act and BC's Wills, Estates and Succession Act (WESA) use different definitions of "spouse" — and the gap between them can cost a surviving partner hundreds of thousands of dollars.
CRA vs. WESA: Common-Law Recognition Comparison
| Factor | CRA (Income Tax Act) | BC WESA |
|---|---|---|
| Cohabitation requirement | 12 consecutive months | 2 years in a marriage-like relationship |
| Purpose | Federal tax treatment (rollovers, credits) | Provincial inheritance and will variation |
| RRSP rollover | Available after 12 months | N/A — WESA does not govern tax |
| Intestacy rights | N/A — CRA does not govern inheritance | Available after 2 years |
| Will variation rights | N/A | Available after 2 years |
| Child shortcut | Yes — having a child together = immediate recognition | No — 2 years required regardless |
The 12-to-24-month gap is the danger zone: CRA recognizes the relationship for tax purposes, but WESA does not recognize it for inheritance. Without a will, a partner in this gap inherits nothing under BC law.
Consider a couple that has been together for 18 months. For CRA purposes, the surviving partner is a common-law spouse — the RRSP rollover applies, deemed disposition is deferred, and all tax benefits are available. But under WESA, the partner is not a spouse. If the deceased died without a will, the partner has no intestacy rights and no standing to bring a will-variation claim. The estate passes to children, parents, or siblings under WESA's intestacy hierarchy — and the tax rollover is wasted because the partner never receives the assets.
The $1.2M Worked Example: $400K RRSP + $800K Property in BC
Marcus dies in June 2026 in Vancouver at age 62. He has been living with his common-law partner Priya for 3 years. They are not legally married and have no children together. Marcus's estate consists of a $400,000 RRSP (Priya named as beneficiary on the form), an $800,000 condo held solely in his name (adjusted cost base: $450,000, not the principal residence — he designated a different property), and $50,000 in a non-registered investment account (ACB: $30,000). Marcus has a will leaving everything to Priya.
Scenario A: Rollover Applies — 3 Years of Cohabitation (CRA-Recognized)
RRSP ($400,000): Rolls to Priya's RRSP under s. 146(8.1). Priya is the named beneficiary and qualifies as a common-law partner (3 years > 12 months). Tax: $0 immediately. Priya will pay tax only when she eventually withdraws.
Condo ($800,000, ACB $450,000): Transfers to Priya at ACB under s. 70(6). Unrealized gain: $350,000. Tax at death: $0. Priya inherits at $450,000 ACB — she will owe capital gains tax when she sells.
Non-registered investments ($50,000, ACB $30,000): Transfers at ACB under s. 70(6). Tax: $0.
BC probate: RRSP bypasses estate (named beneficiary). Estate value for probate: $800,000 condo + $50,000 investments = $850,000. BC probate fees: $350 (first $50K) + $6 × 800 = $5,150. Total: ~$5,150.
Total cost at death: ~$5,150 probate + $0 income tax = ~$5,150
Priya receives: $400K RRSP (in her RRSP) + $800K condo + $50K investments − $5,150 = ~$1,244,850
Scenario B: No Rollover — Only 10 Months of Cohabitation
Same assets, same will — but Marcus and Priya have been together only 10 months. CRA does not recognize Priya as a common-law partner. Every tax rollover is lost.
RRSP ($400,000): Full income inclusion on terminal return under s. 146(8.8). Priya still receives the $400,000 as named beneficiary — but the estate pays the tax.
Federal tax on $400,000 RRSP income: ~$108,000
BC provincial tax: ~$76,000
Combined RRSP tax: ~$184,000
Condo ($800,000, ACB $450,000): Deemed disposition at fair market value. Capital gain: $350,000. Taxable capital gain (2/3 inclusion rate for 2026 on gains above $250,000): ~$216,667 taxable. Tax: ~$95,000
Non-registered investments ($50,000, ACB $30,000): Deemed disposition. Capital gain: $20,000. Taxable: ~$13,333. Tax: ~$5,900
BC probate: Same ~$5,150 (RRSP still bypasses estate)
Total cost: $184,000 + $95,000 + $5,900 + $5,150 = ~$290,050
Priya receives: $1,250,000 − $290,050 = ~$959,950
Cost of missing the 12-month threshold: ~$284,900
The RRSP Rollover Election: What the Executor Must Do
The spousal rollover on an RRSP is not automatic in all cases. When the surviving common-law partner is named as the direct beneficiary on the RRSP form, the rollover happens by operation of law — the financial institution transfers the RRSP to the survivor's registered account, and subsection 146(8.1) defers the income inclusion. The executor's role is to file the terminal return reflecting the rollover.
However, if the RRSP beneficiary is the estate (not Priya directly), the rollover still applies — but the executor must actively elect to transfer the RRSP proceeds to Priya's registered account. This is done by filing a designation on the terminal return under subsection 146(8.1), supported by documentation that Priya qualifies as a common-law partner (12+ months of cohabitation). If the executor misses this election — or if the RRSP is distributed as cash to Priya without being transferred to a registered account — the full $400,000 is included as income on the terminal return and the rollover is permanently lost.
The Missed-Election Trap
If the estate is the RRSP beneficiary and the executor distributes $400,000 in cash to Priya instead of transferring to her RRSP/RRIF, the rollover is lost permanently. The $400,000 is taxed as income on Marcus's terminal return (~$184,000 in tax), and Priya receives $400,000 in non-registered cash that she cannot retroactively shelter. This is a $184,000 mistake that cannot be corrected after the terminal return is filed.
Best practice: Name the common-law partner directly on the RRSP beneficiary form — not the estate. Direct designation eliminates the need for the executor election and ensures the rollover happens automatically.
BC Probate on $1.2M: What's Included and What Bypasses
British Columbia charges probate fees (officially "probate filing fees") on the gross value of the estate that passes through probate. The BC probate fee schedule is: no fee on the first $25,000, $6 per $1,000 on the value between $25,001 and $50,000 ($150), and $6 per $1,000 on the value above $50,000. On a $1.2M estate where all assets pass through probate, the fee is approximately $7,100 on the first $1.2M above $50,000 = ~$6,900 + $350 = ~$16,450 total.
BC Probate: What's In vs. What's Out
| Asset | Passes Through Probate? | Probate Fee Impact |
|---|---|---|
| RRSP with named beneficiary (Priya) | No — bypasses estate | $0 |
| Condo held solely by deceased | Yes — part of estate | Included at $800,000 FMV |
| Non-registered investment account | Yes — part of estate | Included at $50,000 FMV |
| Joint tenancy property (if applicable) | No — passes by right of survivorship | $0 |
| Life insurance with named beneficiary | No — bypasses estate | $0 |
| Probate base in this example | $850,000 | ~$5,150 |
If Marcus had held the condo in joint tenancy with Priya, the property would pass by right of survivorship outside the estate — reducing the probate base to just $50,000 (the non-registered investments) and the probate fee to approximately $350. This is a common probate-minimization strategy for common-law couples in BC, but it has risks: adding a partner to title triggers a potential property transfer tax, and if the relationship breaks down, the joint tenancy creates complicated property division issues.
Intestacy Disaster: What Happens If There Is No Will
This is the scenario that destroys common-law estates in BC more than any tax issue. If Marcus dies without a will, WESA's intestacy rules determine who inherits — and WESA only recognizes a common-law partner as a "spouse" after two years of cohabitation in a marriage-like relationship.
If Cohabitation Exceeds 2 Years (WESA Recognizes the Relationship)
Priya qualifies as Marcus's spouse under WESA. Under BC intestacy rules, she receives the preferential share (the first $300,000 of the estate) plus 50% of the remainder if Marcus has children from a prior relationship. If Marcus has two children from a prior marriage:
- RRSP ($400,000): Priya receives directly as named beneficiary — outside the estate, outside WESA
- Estate assets ($850,000): Priya gets $300,000 preferential share + 50% of $550,000 = $575,000
- Each child: 25% of $550,000 = $137,500
- Total for Priya: $400,000 + $575,000 = $975,000
If Cohabitation Is Under 2 Years (WESA Does NOT Recognize)
Even if the couple has been together 18 months — well past the CRA 12-month threshold — WESA treats Priya as a legal stranger. The estate passes entirely to Marcus's children (or parents, or siblings if no children exist) under the intestacy hierarchy.
The Intestacy Nightmare: 18 Months Together, No Will
Priya receives: $400,000 RRSP only (valid beneficiary designation, outside the estate)
Marcus's children receive: $850,000 (entire estate under intestacy)
Priya's will-variation rights: None — she has no standing under WESA
The tax twist: Because the $800,000 condo passes to Marcus's children (not to Priya), the spousal rollover under s. 70(6) does NOT apply to the condo. The $350,000 capital gain triggers deemed disposition tax of ~$95,000. The RRSP rolls to Priya tax-free (CRA still recognizes her as common-law), but the condo tax is payable by the estate — reducing what the children receive to approximately $755,000.
Total value lost by not having a will: Priya loses ~$575,000 in estate assets she would have received under a will. The estate pays ~$95,000 in capital gains tax that the spousal rollover would have eliminated. Combined impact: ~$670,000.
Blended Families: Where the 12-Month Rule Gets Complicated
The 12-month cohabitation rule creates particular problems for blended families where the deceased enters a new common-law relationship after a divorce. Consider a recently divorced person who begins a new relationship, moves in with their new partner, and dies 8 months later. The new partner is not a CRA-recognized common-law spouse — meaning no spousal rollover on any asset. Meanwhile, the ex-spouse lost all spousal rollover eligibility at the time of the divorce or separation.
The result: neither the new partner nor the ex-spouse qualifies for the rollover. Every RRSP dollar is fully taxable on the terminal return. Every non-registered investment triggers deemed disposition. This is the worst possible outcome — and it happens most often in blended-family estates where the deceased assumed the new partner would automatically inherit and qualify for the tax benefits. The 12-month clock does not care about intentions — only about completed cohabitation time.
Planning for the 12-Month Gap
If you are in a new common-law relationship and have not yet reached the 12-month threshold, your estate plan should assume the rollover is NOT available. This means:
1. Set aside tax reserves: Ensure there is enough liquidity in the estate to cover the full RRSP income tax and deemed disposition tax — potentially 40–50% of the total estate value.
2. Consider life insurance: A term life insurance policy can cover the tax liability during the pre-12-month period. Once the relationship qualifies, the coverage can be reassessed.
3. Write a will immediately: Do not wait for the WESA 2-year threshold. A will can direct assets to the common-law partner regardless of the WESA definition — even if the partner doesn't qualify for intestacy rights, they can receive everything under a will.
4. Name the partner as RRSP beneficiary: Even if the rollover is not yet available, naming the partner ensures the RRSP proceeds bypass probate and reach the intended recipient. The tax is payable by the estate regardless of who receives the RRSP cash.
Capital Gains Inclusion Rate: 2026 Rules for Deemed Disposition
As of 2026, the capital gains inclusion rate is 50% on the first $250,000 of capital gains realized in a year, and 66.67% (two-thirds) on gains exceeding $250,000. This applies to deemed dispositions on death — meaning the $350,000 unrealized gain on Marcus's condo would be taxed as follows if the spousal rollover does not apply:
Capital Gains Tax on $350,000 Unrealized Gain (No Spousal Rollover)
| Component | Gain | Inclusion Rate | Taxable Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| First $250,000 of gain | $250,000 | 50% | $125,000 |
| Gain above $250,000 | $100,000 | 66.67% | $66,667 |
| Total taxable capital gain | $350,000 | — | $191,667 |
At combined federal/BC marginal rates of approximately 49–53%, the tax on $191,667 of taxable capital gains is approximately $95,000–$101,000. With the spousal rollover, this entire amount is deferred to $0.
What Every Common-Law Couple in BC Must Do
The gap between CRA's 12-month definition and WESA's 2-year definition makes BC one of the most complex provinces for common-law estate planning. The rollover saves $200,000+ in tax on a $1.2M estate — but only if the relationship meets the threshold, the will is in place, and the beneficiary designations are correctly structured.
Common-Law Estate Planning Checklist for BC
1. Write a will — immediately. Do not wait for the WESA 2-year threshold. A will ensures your partner inherits regardless of WESA's definition. Without a will, a partner under 2 years of cohabitation receives nothing from the estate.
2. Name your partner as RRSP/RRIF beneficiary on the form. Direct designation bypasses probate, eliminates the need for the executor to make an election, and ensures the rollover happens automatically once the 12-month threshold is met.
3. Document your cohabitation start date. CRA may ask for proof. Keep records: shared lease or mortgage, utility bills in both names, joint bank statements, and any government filings (GST/HST credit, income tax returns) where you reported the relationship.
4. Review beneficiary designations after any separation. A break in cohabitation restarts the 12-month clock. If you separate and reconcile, the clock resets — your tax position changes retroactively.
5. Consider joint tenancy on the principal residence. This bypasses probate on BC's largest probate-fee asset — but consult a lawyer about property transfer tax and family law implications first.
6. If under 12 months: plan for the worst case. Assume no rollover is available. Ensure enough liquidity or insurance to cover the full RRSP tax + deemed disposition tax. Revisit the plan once you pass the 12-month mark.
The Bottom Line: 12 Months Saves $285,000 on a $1.2M BC Estate
The spousal rollover is the single biggest tax break in Canadian estate law — and for common-law partners, it hinges entirely on whether CRA recognizes the relationship at the date of death. On a $1.2M BC estate with a $400,000 RRSP and $800,000 in non-registered property, the rollover defers approximately $285,000 in income tax and capital gains tax. Miss the 12-month cohabitation threshold by even one week, and the full tax bill applies.
But the tax rollover is only half the story. BC's WESA requires two years of cohabitation for intestacy and will-variation rights — creating a dangerous 12-to-24-month gap where CRA says "you're a spouse" but WESA says "you're a stranger." Without a will, a common-law partner in this gap receives nothing from the estate except assets with direct beneficiary designations (like the RRSP). The remaining estate passes to children, parents, or siblings — and the spousal rollover on those assets is lost because the qualifying spouse never receives them.
The fix is straightforward: write a will, name your partner on all registered account beneficiary forms, and document your cohabitation start date. The Canadian inheritance tax system is generous to surviving spouses — but only if you qualify, and only if the legal structure is in place to receive the assets. For common-law couples in BC, the margin for error is measured in months.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q:How does CRA define a common-law partner for the spousal rollover?
A:Under subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act, a common-law partner is a person who cohabits with the taxpayer in a conjugal relationship and either (a) has done so continuously for at least 12 months, or (b) is the parent of a child of the taxpayer by birth or adoption. The 12-month period must be continuous — any separation that breaks the conjugal relationship restarts the clock. Temporary absences for work, travel, or medical treatment do not break continuity if the couple maintains the relationship. The CRA looks at the totality of the relationship: shared residence, financial interdependence, social recognition, sexual relationship, and shared parenting responsibilities. This definition applies uniformly across all provinces for federal tax purposes, regardless of how the province defines common-law relationships for family law or estate purposes.
Q:What is the difference between the 12-month CRA rule and BC WESA two-year rule?
A:These are entirely separate legal frameworks with different purposes. The CRA 12-month rule (subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act) determines who qualifies as a 'common-law partner' for federal tax benefits — including the spousal rollover on RRSPs and capital property. The BC WESA two-year rule (section 2 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act) determines who qualifies as a 'spouse' for provincial intestacy and will-variation purposes. A couple together for 18 months qualifies for all federal tax rollovers but does NOT qualify as spouses under WESA. This means: if there is no will, the common-law partner has no automatic inheritance rights under BC law, even though they would have been eligible for the tax-free rollover had they inherited the assets. The practical implication: common-law couples in BC must have a will. Relying on intestacy rules is catastrophic for any relationship under two years.
Q:What happens to the RRSP if the common-law relationship is under 12 months at death?
A:The RRSP is fully taxable on the deceased's terminal return. Without a qualifying spouse or common-law partner (12+ months) or financially dependent child, the RRSP does not qualify for the rollover under subsection 146(8.1). The full fair-market value — $400,000 in this example — is included as ordinary income on the terminal T1 under subsection 146(8.8). At combined federal/BC marginal rates reaching 53.50% on income above $227,091, the tax on $400,000 of RRSP income is approximately $190,000–$210,000 depending on other income in the year of death. The common-law partner may still be the named beneficiary on the RRSP form and receive the $400,000 cash directly from the financial institution — but the tax is payable by the estate, not the beneficiary. This creates a potential conflict: the partner receives the full RRSP while the estate bears the tax bill, reducing what other beneficiaries receive.
Q:Does BC probate apply to RRSP proceeds transferred to a beneficiary?
A:No — if the RRSP has a named beneficiary (whether a common-law spouse or anyone else), the RRSP proceeds transfer directly from the financial institution to the beneficiary and bypass the estate entirely. BC probate fees apply only to assets that form part of the deceased's estate — property that passes through the will or intestacy. On a $1.2M total estate where $400,000 is in an RRSP with a named beneficiary, the probate base is reduced to $800,000. BC probate on $800,000 is approximately $10,850 (vs. $16,450 on the full $1.2M). Joint tenancy property also bypasses probate — if the $800,000 property is held in joint tenancy with the common-law partner, both the RRSP and the property bypass probate, potentially reducing the probate base to near zero.
Q:Can a common-law partner challenge a will that excludes them under WESA?
A:Yes — but only if the relationship meets WESA's two-year cohabitation threshold. Under Part 4 of WESA (will variation), a spouse (including a common-law spouse of 2+ years) can apply to the BC Supreme Court to vary the will if it does not make 'adequate provision' for them. This is a powerful tool: courts routinely redistribute estate assets to surviving spouses who were excluded or under-provided for in the will. However, a common-law partner with fewer than two years of cohabitation has no standing to bring a will-variation claim under WESA. They cannot challenge the will regardless of the strength of their relationship or their financial dependence on the deceased. This is why the two-year WESA threshold is critical for estate planning — and why couples approaching but not yet at the two-year mark need a will that explicitly provides for the partner.
Q:What if the common-law partner and the deceased have a child together — does that change the tax rules?
A:Yes — having a child together is an alternative path to common-law status under subsection 248(1). If the taxpayer and the cohabiting partner are parents of a child by birth or adoption, they qualify as common-law partners for CRA purposes immediately — without needing to complete the 12-month cohabitation period. This means the spousal rollover on RRSPs and capital property is available from the moment the child is born or adopted, as long as the couple is cohabiting in a conjugal relationship at the time of death. However, this shortcut applies only to the CRA definition. BC WESA still requires two years of cohabitation for intestacy and will-variation purposes — having a child together does not accelerate the WESA timeline. The child changes the tax picture but not the estate law picture.
Question: How does CRA define a common-law partner for the spousal rollover?
Answer: Under subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act, a common-law partner is a person who cohabits with the taxpayer in a conjugal relationship and either (a) has done so continuously for at least 12 months, or (b) is the parent of a child of the taxpayer by birth or adoption. The 12-month period must be continuous — any separation that breaks the conjugal relationship restarts the clock. Temporary absences for work, travel, or medical treatment do not break continuity if the couple maintains the relationship. The CRA looks at the totality of the relationship: shared residence, financial interdependence, social recognition, sexual relationship, and shared parenting responsibilities. This definition applies uniformly across all provinces for federal tax purposes, regardless of how the province defines common-law relationships for family law or estate purposes.
Question: What is the difference between the 12-month CRA rule and BC WESA two-year rule?
Answer: These are entirely separate legal frameworks with different purposes. The CRA 12-month rule (subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act) determines who qualifies as a 'common-law partner' for federal tax benefits — including the spousal rollover on RRSPs and capital property. The BC WESA two-year rule (section 2 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act) determines who qualifies as a 'spouse' for provincial intestacy and will-variation purposes. A couple together for 18 months qualifies for all federal tax rollovers but does NOT qualify as spouses under WESA. This means: if there is no will, the common-law partner has no automatic inheritance rights under BC law, even though they would have been eligible for the tax-free rollover had they inherited the assets. The practical implication: common-law couples in BC must have a will. Relying on intestacy rules is catastrophic for any relationship under two years.
Question: What happens to the RRSP if the common-law relationship is under 12 months at death?
Answer: The RRSP is fully taxable on the deceased's terminal return. Without a qualifying spouse or common-law partner (12+ months) or financially dependent child, the RRSP does not qualify for the rollover under subsection 146(8.1). The full fair-market value — $400,000 in this example — is included as ordinary income on the terminal T1 under subsection 146(8.8). At combined federal/BC marginal rates reaching 53.50% on income above $227,091, the tax on $400,000 of RRSP income is approximately $190,000–$210,000 depending on other income in the year of death. The common-law partner may still be the named beneficiary on the RRSP form and receive the $400,000 cash directly from the financial institution — but the tax is payable by the estate, not the beneficiary. This creates a potential conflict: the partner receives the full RRSP while the estate bears the tax bill, reducing what other beneficiaries receive.
Question: Does BC probate apply to RRSP proceeds transferred to a beneficiary?
Answer: No — if the RRSP has a named beneficiary (whether a common-law spouse or anyone else), the RRSP proceeds transfer directly from the financial institution to the beneficiary and bypass the estate entirely. BC probate fees apply only to assets that form part of the deceased's estate — property that passes through the will or intestacy. On a $1.2M total estate where $400,000 is in an RRSP with a named beneficiary, the probate base is reduced to $800,000. BC probate on $800,000 is approximately $10,850 (vs. $16,450 on the full $1.2M). Joint tenancy property also bypasses probate — if the $800,000 property is held in joint tenancy with the common-law partner, both the RRSP and the property bypass probate, potentially reducing the probate base to near zero.
Question: Can a common-law partner challenge a will that excludes them under WESA?
Answer: Yes — but only if the relationship meets WESA's two-year cohabitation threshold. Under Part 4 of WESA (will variation), a spouse (including a common-law spouse of 2+ years) can apply to the BC Supreme Court to vary the will if it does not make 'adequate provision' for them. This is a powerful tool: courts routinely redistribute estate assets to surviving spouses who were excluded or under-provided for in the will. However, a common-law partner with fewer than two years of cohabitation has no standing to bring a will-variation claim under WESA. They cannot challenge the will regardless of the strength of their relationship or their financial dependence on the deceased. This is why the two-year WESA threshold is critical for estate planning — and why couples approaching but not yet at the two-year mark need a will that explicitly provides for the partner.
Question: What if the common-law partner and the deceased have a child together — does that change the tax rules?
Answer: Yes — having a child together is an alternative path to common-law status under subsection 248(1). If the taxpayer and the cohabiting partner are parents of a child by birth or adoption, they qualify as common-law partners for CRA purposes immediately — without needing to complete the 12-month cohabitation period. This means the spousal rollover on RRSPs and capital property is available from the moment the child is born or adopted, as long as the couple is cohabiting in a conjugal relationship at the time of death. However, this shortcut applies only to the CRA definition. BC WESA still requires two years of cohabitation for intestacy and will-variation purposes — having a child together does not accelerate the WESA timeline. The child changes the tax picture but not the estate law picture.
Related Articles
Deemed Disposition on Death for BC Residents With $1M in Non-Registered Accounts: 2026 Tax Walkthrough
read →$1.5M BC Estate: $22,000 in Probate Fees — How British Columbia's $6/$1,000 Rate Works
read →Inheritance Tax Canada 2026: Complete Guide
read →Spousal Trust vs. Outright Bequest in Ontario 2026: Side-by-Side Tax Calculator
read →RRIF Death Tax Calculator Canada 2026: What a $300K, $600K, and $1.2M Account Costs the Estate
read →Ready to Take Control of Your Financial Future?
Get personalized inheritance planning advice from Toronto's trusted financial advisors.
Schedule Your Free Consultation