Is a Workplace Pension Halal? The 2026 Shariah Verdict for DB, DC, and Group RRSPs

Quick Answer

Conditional — the verdict turns on who owns the assets. A defined-benefit (DB) pension is generally permissible under the majority contemporary scholarly view: you never own or direct the investments, and your benefit is a deferred-wage obligation set by formula, not by market returns. A defined-contribution (DC) plan or group RRSP is different — you own the account and pick the funds, so the AAOIFI screen (debt ≤30%, cash plus interest-bearing securities ≤30%, impermissible income ≤5%) applies to every fund you select, and most default target-date funds fail on both their bond sleeve and their bank holdings. Do not opt out blindly: capture the employer match (worth $3,600 a year on a $90,000 salary at 4%), switch to the cleanest fund on the menu, purify, and route savings above the match into halal ETFs — WSHR (0.50%), HLAL (0.50%), or SPUS (0.45%) — in your own TFSA or RRSP.

Talk to a CFP — free 15-minute call

If you are enrolled in a workplace pension or group RRSP and want a Shariah-compliant plan for the whole picture — the plan at work, your TFSA, your RRSP, and any LIRA from a past employer — book a free 15-minute call with our halal investing team. We run the AAOIFI screen against your actual fund menu.

The One Question That Decides the Verdict: Who Owns the Assets?

More than 7.2 million Canadians are active members of a registered pension plan, and over two-thirds of that membership sits in defined-benefit plans (Statistics Canada, as of January 1, 2024). For a Muslim employee in the GTA — whether you teach in Toronto, work for a Mississauga hospital, or sit in a Brampton corporate office — the question "is my pension halal?" gets asked as if it has one answer. It has two, and the dividing line is asset ownership.

If you never own or direct the investments — a DB pension, CPP — the majority contemporary scholarly view treats your benefit as deferred wages, and the fund's investment choices are not on your account. If you do own the account and pick the funds — a DC pension, a group RRSP, a DPSP, a LIRA — then the standard Shariah screen applies to every fund you select, exactly as it would in your personal brokerage account. Here is the full map:

Plan type	Who owns the assets	Who picks the investments	Shariah status
Defined-benefit (DB) pension	The plan, not you	Plan trustees	Generally permissible (majority view)
Defined-contribution (DC) pension	You	You, from a menu	Conditional — screen the funds you pick
Group RRSP / DPSP	You	You, from a menu	Conditional — same screen as DC
CPP	Government (CPP Investments)	CPP Investments board	Permissible to receive — mandatory, no control
LIRA (commuted value from a former plan)	You	You, with full control	Screen applies in full — easiest to make 100% halal

Defined-Benefit Pensions: Why the Majority View Says Permissible

A DB pension — the structure behind Ontario Teachers', OMERS, HOOPP, and most public-sector plans in Ontario — promises a formula, not a portfolio. A typical formula pays 2% of your best-five-year average salary per year of service. Work 30 years and retire on a $100,000 average, and the plan owes you $60,000 a year for life, whether the fund's investments returned 12% or lost money. That structure drives three arguments the majority of contemporary scholars accept:

No ownership, no agency. You hold a legal claim against the plan, not a slice of its portfolio. The trustees' decision to hold bank bonds is not your transaction, any more than your employer's corporate banking arrangements are.
The benefit is deferred wages. Your pension is compensation for labour already performed, paid on a delayed schedule. Lawful work produces lawful wages — the payment mechanism does not change their character.
Participation is compelled. DB membership is almost always a mandatory condition of employment. Compulsion removes the element of voluntary engagement with riba that the prohibition targets.

A stricter minority position exists, and it deserves honest airtime: some scholars hold that because the fund grows partly through interest and non-compliant holdings, a member should estimate the impermissible portion of each pension payment and donate it. If that is your scholar's position, the remedy is purification of a portion of the income in retirement — not quitting your job, and not refusing the pension you earned.

The exception: voluntary buybacks and additional contributions

The permissibility logic leans heavily on compulsion — which means it weakens when you volunteer. Service buybacks and additional voluntary contributions (AVCs) are elective decisions to place new money into a conventionally invested pool. The cautious call here is to skip the AVCs and direct that same money into accounts you control: a halal TFSA takes $7,000 of new room in 2026 ($109,000 cumulative since 2009), and every dollar inside it can sit in Shariah-screened funds of your choosing. A buyback that materially increases a guaranteed formula benefit is a harder trade-off — weigh it with your scholar — but the default for surplus savings should be the accounts where compliance is fully in your hands.

DC Pensions and Group RRSPs: The Screen Is On You

The moment the account is yours and the fund menu is in front of you, the analysis flips. You are now an investor selecting investments, and the same screen we apply across our halal ETF coverage applies to every option on that menu. AAOIFI Shari'ah Standard No. 21 — the strictest of the mainstream methodologies — runs two stages: a business-activity screen (out if more than 5% of revenue comes from conventional finance, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, pork, adult entertainment, or weapons), then three financial ratios:

AAOIFI ratio test	Threshold	Typical group-plan default fund
Interest-bearing debt ÷ market cap	≤ 30%	Fails — many index constituents exceed it
Cash + interest-bearing securities ÷ market cap	≤ 30%	Fails — bond sleeve breaches it by design
Impermissible income ÷ total income	≤ 5%	Fails — financial-sector income far exceeds 5%

The default fund in nearly every Canadian group plan is a target-date or balanced fund, and these fail twice over. The bond allocation is riba by construction — there is no screening debate about conventional bonds. And the equity sleeve tracks broad indexes where conventional banks and insurers are structural: financials are roughly 30% of the TSX Composite and roughly 11-13% of the S&P 500. The same problem sinks unscreened index funds generally, and it is why all-equity portfolios like XEQT fail the screen despite holding no bonds at all. Your group plan menu is, with rare exceptions, a list of non-compliant funds in different proportions.

The Four-Step Playbook for a Non-Compliant DC Plan or Group RRSP

Step 1: Capture the full employer match — it is your salary

The match is compensation, not investment income, and no mainstream methodology treats earned wages as impermissible. The math says everything: on a $90,000 salary with a dollar-for-dollar match on your first 4%, your $3,600 contribution earns $3,600 of employer money every year. Opt out and you forfeit it — roughly $197,000 of compounded compensation over 25 years at a 6% return. The compliance problem lives in the fund the money lands in, and that is fixable. Walking away from the match fixes nothing and costs six figures.

Step 2: Switch to the cleanest fund on the menu today

While no perfect option exists on most menus, the funds are not equally bad. Two moves cut the impermissible exposure sharply: drop the bond sleeve (all-equity over balanced or target-date — bonds are a 100% fail, equities a partial one), and prefer a US equity index over a Canadian one, because financials run roughly 11-13% of the S&P 500 versus roughly 30% of the TSX Composite. A US all-equity index fund is still non-compliant — but it roughly halves the haram weight versus the Canadian default while you execute step 3.

Step 3: Ask the sponsor for a Shariah-compliant fund — in writing

Group plan providers can generally add a fund to the menu when the plan sponsor requests it; sponsors rarely do because nobody asks. Put the request to HR in writing, name candidates — WSHR (Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF, 0.50% management fee) is Canadian-listed and the simplest add, with HLAL (0.50%) and SPUS (0.45%) as US-listed alternatives covered in our ranking of the best halal ETFs in Canada — and recruit Muslim colleagues to co-sign. Ask in the same email whether the plan offers a self-directed brokerage window; larger plans sometimes allow members to direct part of the balance into a brokerage account inside the plan, which solves the problem immediately.

Step 4: Purify annually, and route everything above the match to accounts you control

For the non-compliant exposure you cannot eliminate, purify: screeners like Musaffa and Zoya report the impermissible-income share of major funds, and the standard practice is to donate that share of your returns to charity (with no expectation of reward and no tax-deduction motive — it is a cleansing, not a gift). Then cap your plan contribution at the match threshold and send every additional savings dollar where compliance is total: $7,000 of 2026 TFSA room, and your personal RRSP — noting that group RRSP contributions consume the same room, up to the $33,810 limit for 2026 — filled with halal ETFs you select. If you would rather not manage it yourself, Wealthsimple's managed Halal portfolio runs roughly 0.9-1.0% all-in (the 0.5% account management fee, 0.4% above $100,000, plus WSHR's 0.50% underneath).

What About CPP?

CPP is the strongest case for permissibility in the entire Canadian retirement system. Contributions are a statutory levy — 5.95% of earnings up to the $74,600 YMPE in 2026, matched by your employer, with a further 4% CPP2 layer between $74,600 and $85,000 — and no employed Canadian can decline to pay. You never own the assets, you have no vote on how CPP Investments allocates them, and your benefit (up to $1,507.65 per month at 65 in 2026) is set by a contribution formula. Compulsion plus zero ownership plus zero control: every pillar of the DB permissibility argument, reinforced by law. Receive your CPP without hesitation; purify a portion in retirement if your scholar advises it.

Leaving Your Employer: The LIRA Is Your Halal Reset Button

When you leave a job with a pension, the commuted value often lands in a LIRA — and at that moment, the ownership question flips in your favour. A LIRA is fully self-directed: sell whatever default fund the transfer arrived in (no tax on trades inside the account) and rebuild it as a 100% Shariah-compliant portfolio. The realistic menu:

Option	Coverage	Fee
WSHR (Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF)	Global developed-market equity, Shariah-screened	0.50% management fee
HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF)	US equity, Shariah-screened	0.50%
SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF)	US large-cap, Shariah-screened	0.45%
Wealthsimple Halal managed portfolio	Managed, WSHR-based	~0.9-1.0% all-in

One warning in the other direction: do not commute a DB pension you are still entitled to solely to escape a compliance concern. The majority view already permits keeping it, and commuting trades a guaranteed inflation-linked formula benefit for market risk — frequently with a portion of the commuted value paid as immediately taxable cash because it exceeds the prescribed transfer limit. Commutation is a retirement-income decision with its own math; the halal question alone does not justify it.

The Honest Bottom Line

"Is my pension halal?" is really two questions wearing one coat. If the plan owns the assets and owes you a formula — DB, CPP — the majority of contemporary scholars say your benefit is lawful deferred compensation, with purification of a portion as the cautious option rather than refusal. If you own the account and pick the funds — DC, group RRSP, DPSP, LIRA — then you are an investor, the AAOIFI screen applies in full, and the default fund your plan put you in almost certainly fails it.

The practical order of operations does not change with madhhab: take every dollar of employer match, move to the cleanest fund on the menu, ask the sponsor in writing for a Shariah-compliant option, purify what you cannot fix, and build the rest of your retirement in the TFSA, RRSP, and LIRA where every holding is your call. The plan at work is the hardest account to perfect — which is exactly why the accounts you control should be flawless.

Want the screen run on your actual plan menu?

Send us your group plan's fund list and we will map the cleanest available option, the match math on your salary, and the halal ETF mix for your TFSA, RRSP, and any LIRA — book a free 15-minute call with our halal investing team.

Disclaimer: This article applies the AAOIFI Shariah Standard No. 21 screening methodology to publicly reported data, and summarizes contemporary scholarly positions on pension participation. Shariah-compliance rulings involve scholarly interpretation — for a binding ruling on your specific plan, consult a qualified Islamic finance scholar. Fund holdings and financial ratios change quarterly; verify current data via Musaffa or Zoya before acting. This is not a fatwa.

Related 2026 guides

Key Takeaways

1DB pensions: generally permissible (majority view) — you never own the underlying assets, and the benefit is a formula-based deferred-wage obligation of the employer, not an investment return
2DC pensions and group RRSPs: conditional — you own the account and pick the funds, so the AAOIFI 30/30/5 screen applies; default target-date funds fail on both the bond sleeve (riba) and conventional bank holdings
3Take the employer match — skipping a 4% match on a $90,000 salary forfeits $3,600 a year, roughly $197,000 over 25 years at 6%; the match itself is lawful deferred wages
4CPP is permissible to receive — contributions are a mandatory statutory levy (5.95% on earnings up to $74,600 in 2026) with zero member ownership or control over the fund
5A LIRA from a former employer is the easiest account to make 100% halal — you control every holding, so fill it with WSHR (0.50%), HLAL (0.50%), or SPUS (0.45%)

Frequently Asked Questions

Q:Is a defined-benefit pension haram in Islam?

A:Under the majority contemporary scholarly view, no. A defined-benefit (DB) pension pays you a formula-based amount — typically a percentage of your salary multiplied by years of service — regardless of how the pension fund's investments perform. You never own the underlying assets, you have no say in how they are invested, and your legal claim is against the plan, not against the portfolio. Contemporary North American scholarly bodies treat the DB benefit as deferred compensation for your labour: lawful wages paid on a delayed schedule, not investment returns from a non-compliant portfolio. Participation is usually mandatory as a condition of employment, which strengthens the permissibility further. A minority of scholars take a stricter view and recommend estimating the interest-derived portion of the benefit and purifying it by donation. If you follow a scholar who holds that position, purification is the remedy — not opting out of the plan or refusing the pension.

Q:Should I opt out of my workplace pension plan as a Muslim?

A:Almost never — and for DB plans, opting out is usually not even an option because membership is a mandatory condition of employment. For voluntary DC plans and group RRSPs, opting out entirely means forfeiting the employer match, which is real compensation you have earned. On a $90,000 salary with a 4% match, walking away costs you $3,600 per year — roughly $197,000 over 25 years at a 6% return. The mainstream scholarly position is that the match itself is lawful deferred wages; the compliance question attaches to what the money is invested in, and that is a problem you can usually fix from inside the plan by switching funds, requesting a Shariah-compliant option, and purifying. Contribute enough to capture the full match, make the menu as clean as you can, and direct every dollar of savings above the match into halal ETFs in your own TFSA or RRSP where you control the holdings completely.

Q:Is the employer match on my group RRSP or DC pension halal?

A:Yes — the match is compensation, not investment income. When your employer contributes 50 cents or a dollar for every dollar you put in, that money is part of your remuneration package, the same as salary. No mainstream Shariah screening methodology treats earned wages as impermissible based on the account they are deposited into. The compliance issue is downstream: once the matched dollars land in the plan, they get invested in whatever fund you selected, and if that fund holds bonds and conventional banks, the growth on the money raises the same screening problems as any non-compliant fund. The correct response is to take the match — refusing it is refusing your own wages — and then deal with the investment problem directly: pick the cleanest fund on the menu, ask the plan sponsor to add a Shariah-compliant option, and purify the impermissible portion of the returns annually.

Q:Are the target-date funds in my group RRSP Shariah-compliant?

A:No. Target-date funds fail Shariah screening twice over. First, every target-date fund holds a bond allocation that grows as you approach the retirement date — and bonds are interest-bearing instruments (riba) by construction, categorically excluded under every screening methodology. Second, the equity sleeve tracks broad-market indexes that include conventional banks and insurers: financials are roughly 30% of the TSX Composite and roughly 11-13% of the S&P 500, far above the 5% impermissible-income threshold in AAOIFI Standard 21. A 2050 target-date fund might be 90% equity today, but that equity includes RBC, TD, JPMorgan, and every other major financial institution in the index. There is no target-date fund on a standard Canadian group plan menu that passes AAOIFI, S&P/DJIM, FTSE Islamic, or MSCI Islamic screening. If your plan defaulted you into one — and most plans do — switching funds is step one.

Q:Can I purify my pension instead of changing the investments?

A:The answer splits by account type. For a DB pension, purification is the remedy the stricter scholars prescribe — you cannot change how the fund invests, you do not own the assets, and the majority view does not require purification at all, so estimating and donating a portion of the benefit satisfies even the cautious position. For a DC plan or group RRSP, purification alone is not enough when you have compliant or cleaner options available and choose not to use them. Purification is designed for incidental impermissible income in an otherwise compliant portfolio — the trace interest a halal-screened company earns on its cash, for example. It is not a licence to knowingly hold a bond-heavy target-date fund when the menu offers an all-equity index option, or when you can ask the sponsor for a Shariah-compliant fund. Use purification for what you cannot control; fix what you can.

Q:Is CPP halal? I have no choice about contributing.

A:Receiving CPP is permissible under the broad contemporary scholarly consensus, and the reasoning is the strongest version of the DB logic. CPP contributions are a statutory levy — 5.95% of earnings up to the $74,600 YMPE in 2026, matched by your employer — collected under federal law with no opt-out for employed Canadians. You never own the assets, you have no influence over how CPP Investments allocates the fund, and your retirement benefit (up to $1,507.65 per month at age 65 in 2026) is calculated by a contribution formula, not by investment performance. Compulsion removes moral responsibility for the fund's investment choices, and the benefit you receive is your own contributions returned with a state guarantee. Some cautious scholars suggest purifying a portion of CPP income; the majority do not require it. Either way, declining CPP is neither required nor possible.

Q:What should I ask HR to add to our DC plan or group RRSP menu?

A:Ask the plan sponsor — usually HR or the benefits committee — to add a Shariah-compliant equity fund to the investment menu, and name candidates: the Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR, 0.50% management fee) is Canadian-listed and the most straightforward request, while HLAL (0.50%) and SPUS (0.45%) are US-listed alternatives. Group plan providers can generally add a fund when the sponsor requests it; the sponsor simply needs to know there is demand, so put the request in writing and find other Muslim colleagues to co-sign it. The second thing worth asking about is a self-directed brokerage window — some larger plans allow members to direct part of their balance into a brokerage account inside the plan, which lets you buy halal ETFs directly without waiting for a menu change. While you wait, hold the cleanest fund available — an all-equity US index option beats a Canadian equity or balanced fund on financial-sector weight — and purify.

Q:I left my employer and have a LIRA — how do I make it halal?

A:A LIRA (locked-in retirement account) is the easiest retirement account to make fully Shariah-compliant, because the moment your commuted pension value lands in it, you own the assets and control every holding. Open the LIRA at a brokerage, sell whatever default fund the transfer arrived in — there is no tax on trades inside a LIRA — and buy purpose-built halal ETFs: WSHR at a 0.50% management fee for global Shariah-screened equity, or a blend of HLAL (0.50%) and SPUS (0.45%) for US-focused exposure. One caution on the other direction: do not commute a DB pension solely to escape a compliance concern. The majority scholarly view already permits keeping the DB pension, and commuting trades a guaranteed formula benefit for market risk, often with a large slice of the commuted value paid out as immediately taxable cash above the transfer limit. If the commuted value is already in a LIRA because you changed jobs, make it halal today — that part is simple.

Question: Is a defined-benefit pension haram in Islam?

Answer: Under the majority contemporary scholarly view, no. A defined-benefit (DB) pension pays you a formula-based amount — typically a percentage of your salary multiplied by years of service — regardless of how the pension fund's investments perform. You never own the underlying assets, you have no say in how they are invested, and your legal claim is against the plan, not against the portfolio. Contemporary North American scholarly bodies treat the DB benefit as deferred compensation for your labour: lawful wages paid on a delayed schedule, not investment returns from a non-compliant portfolio. Participation is usually mandatory as a condition of employment, which strengthens the permissibility further. A minority of scholars take a stricter view and recommend estimating the interest-derived portion of the benefit and purifying it by donation. If you follow a scholar who holds that position, purification is the remedy — not opting out of the plan or refusing the pension.

Question: Should I opt out of my workplace pension plan as a Muslim?

Answer: Almost never — and for DB plans, opting out is usually not even an option because membership is a mandatory condition of employment. For voluntary DC plans and group RRSPs, opting out entirely means forfeiting the employer match, which is real compensation you have earned. On a $90,000 salary with a 4% match, walking away costs you $3,600 per year — roughly $197,000 over 25 years at a 6% return. The mainstream scholarly position is that the match itself is lawful deferred wages; the compliance question attaches to what the money is invested in, and that is a problem you can usually fix from inside the plan by switching funds, requesting a Shariah-compliant option, and purifying. Contribute enough to capture the full match, make the menu as clean as you can, and direct every dollar of savings above the match into halal ETFs in your own TFSA or RRSP where you control the holdings completely.

Question: Is the employer match on my group RRSP or DC pension halal?

Answer: Yes — the match is compensation, not investment income. When your employer contributes 50 cents or a dollar for every dollar you put in, that money is part of your remuneration package, the same as salary. No mainstream Shariah screening methodology treats earned wages as impermissible based on the account they are deposited into. The compliance issue is downstream: once the matched dollars land in the plan, they get invested in whatever fund you selected, and if that fund holds bonds and conventional banks, the growth on the money raises the same screening problems as any non-compliant fund. The correct response is to take the match — refusing it is refusing your own wages — and then deal with the investment problem directly: pick the cleanest fund on the menu, ask the plan sponsor to add a Shariah-compliant option, and purify the impermissible portion of the returns annually.

Question: Are the target-date funds in my group RRSP Shariah-compliant?

Answer: No. Target-date funds fail Shariah screening twice over. First, every target-date fund holds a bond allocation that grows as you approach the retirement date — and bonds are interest-bearing instruments (riba) by construction, categorically excluded under every screening methodology. Second, the equity sleeve tracks broad-market indexes that include conventional banks and insurers: financials are roughly 30% of the TSX Composite and roughly 11-13% of the S&P 500, far above the 5% impermissible-income threshold in AAOIFI Standard 21. A 2050 target-date fund might be 90% equity today, but that equity includes RBC, TD, JPMorgan, and every other major financial institution in the index. There is no target-date fund on a standard Canadian group plan menu that passes AAOIFI, S&P/DJIM, FTSE Islamic, or MSCI Islamic screening. If your plan defaulted you into one — and most plans do — switching funds is step one.

Question: Can I purify my pension instead of changing the investments?

Answer: The answer splits by account type. For a DB pension, purification is the remedy the stricter scholars prescribe — you cannot change how the fund invests, you do not own the assets, and the majority view does not require purification at all, so estimating and donating a portion of the benefit satisfies even the cautious position. For a DC plan or group RRSP, purification alone is not enough when you have compliant or cleaner options available and choose not to use them. Purification is designed for incidental impermissible income in an otherwise compliant portfolio — the trace interest a halal-screened company earns on its cash, for example. It is not a licence to knowingly hold a bond-heavy target-date fund when the menu offers an all-equity index option, or when you can ask the sponsor for a Shariah-compliant fund. Use purification for what you cannot control; fix what you can.

Question: Is CPP halal? I have no choice about contributing.

Answer: Receiving CPP is permissible under the broad contemporary scholarly consensus, and the reasoning is the strongest version of the DB logic. CPP contributions are a statutory levy — 5.95% of earnings up to the $74,600 YMPE in 2026, matched by your employer — collected under federal law with no opt-out for employed Canadians. You never own the assets, you have no influence over how CPP Investments allocates the fund, and your retirement benefit (up to $1,507.65 per month at age 65 in 2026) is calculated by a contribution formula, not by investment performance. Compulsion removes moral responsibility for the fund's investment choices, and the benefit you receive is your own contributions returned with a state guarantee. Some cautious scholars suggest purifying a portion of CPP income; the majority do not require it. Either way, declining CPP is neither required nor possible.

Question: What should I ask HR to add to our DC plan or group RRSP menu?

Answer: Ask the plan sponsor — usually HR or the benefits committee — to add a Shariah-compliant equity fund to the investment menu, and name candidates: the Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR, 0.50% management fee) is Canadian-listed and the most straightforward request, while HLAL (0.50%) and SPUS (0.45%) are US-listed alternatives. Group plan providers can generally add a fund when the sponsor requests it; the sponsor simply needs to know there is demand, so put the request in writing and find other Muslim colleagues to co-sign it. The second thing worth asking about is a self-directed brokerage window — some larger plans allow members to direct part of their balance into a brokerage account inside the plan, which lets you buy halal ETFs directly without waiting for a menu change. While you wait, hold the cleanest fund available — an all-equity US index option beats a Canadian equity or balanced fund on financial-sector weight — and purify.

Question: I left my employer and have a LIRA — how do I make it halal?

Answer: A LIRA (locked-in retirement account) is the easiest retirement account to make fully Shariah-compliant, because the moment your commuted pension value lands in it, you own the assets and control every holding. Open the LIRA at a brokerage, sell whatever default fund the transfer arrived in — there is no tax on trades inside a LIRA — and buy purpose-built halal ETFs: WSHR at a 0.50% management fee for global Shariah-screened equity, or a blend of HLAL (0.50%) and SPUS (0.45%) for US-focused exposure. One caution on the other direction: do not commute a DB pension solely to escape a compliance concern. The majority scholarly view already permits keeping the DB pension, and commuting trades a guaranteed formula benefit for market risk, often with a large slice of the commuted value paid out as immediately taxable cash above the transfer limit. If the commuted value is already in a LIRA because you changed jobs, make it halal today — that part is simple.