Non-Resident Heir Inheriting a $900,000 BC Rental Property in 2026: Section 116 Clearance Certificate Timeline and the 25% Holdback Trap

Amy Ali
16 min read

Key Takeaways

  • 1Understanding non-resident heir inheriting a $900,000 bc rental property in 2026: section 116 clearance certificate timeline and the 25% holdback trap is crucial for financial success
  • 2Professional guidance can save thousands in taxes and fees
  • 3Early planning leads to better outcomes
  • 4GTA residents have unique considerations for inheritance planning
  • 5Taking action now prevents costly mistakes later

Quick Summary

This article covers 5 key points about key takeaways, providing essential insights for informed decision-making.

Quick Answer

When a Canadian estate includes a $900,000 BC rental property with an adjusted cost base (ACB) of $300,000, and the heir is a non-resident of Canada, the estate executor faces a dual problem. First, the deceased's terminal return triggers a deemed disposition at fair market value — producing a $600,000 capital gain ($300,000 taxable at the 2/3 inclusion rate effective June 25, 2024). Second, if the property is distributed or sold and proceeds sent to a non-resident, Section 116 of the Income Tax Act requires the non-resident (or the estate acting on their behalf) to obtain a clearance certificate from CRA before the buyer or estate can release more than 75% of the proceeds. The remaining 25% — $225,000 on a $900,000 property — is held back by the notary or lawyer and remitted to CRA unless the certificate is obtained first. CRA's processing time for Section 116 certificates averages 8–16 weeks, but complex estates can wait 6–12 months. During this period, the heir receives nothing. If the executor distributes without obtaining the certificate, the executor becomes personally liable for the non-resident's Canadian tax — up to 25% of the gross proceeds. Add CCA recapture on the building's undepreciated capital cost as a separate income inclusion on the terminal return, and the total tax bill on this property alone can exceed $180,000.

Key Takeaways

  • 1Section 116 of the Income Tax Act applies whenever a non-resident of Canada disposes of — or is deemed to dispose of — 'taxable Canadian property.' A rental property in BC is taxable Canadian property. When the deceased was a Canadian resident and the heir is a non-resident, the deemed disposition on death triggers both the terminal return capital gain AND the Section 116 notification requirement. The executor must file a T2062 (Notice by a Non-Resident of Canada Concerning the Disposition or Proposed Disposition of Taxable Canadian Property) with CRA and obtain a clearance certificate before distributing proceeds to the non-resident heir.
  • 2The 25% holdback is not optional — it is a legal obligation under subsection 116(5). Any person (the buyer, the estate's lawyer, or the notary in BC) who pays a non-resident for taxable Canadian property without a clearance certificate must withhold 25% of the gross sale price and remit it to CRA. On a $900,000 property, that is $225,000 held back. If the holdback is not made and the clearance certificate is not obtained, the payer (including the executor) becomes personally liable to CRA for the 25% — even if the non-resident heir has already left the country with the funds.
  • 3CCA recapture is a separate taxable event from the capital gain. If the deceased claimed Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) on the rental building during their lifetime — reducing the undepreciated capital cost (UCC) below the original cost — the difference between the UCC and the lesser of the original cost or the fair market value at death is recaptured as ordinary income on the terminal return. On a building originally costing $400,000 with a UCC of $280,000, that is $120,000 in CCA recapture taxed at the deceased's full marginal rate — not at the capital gains inclusion rate.
  • 4US-resident heirs face a double tax risk: Canada taxes the deemed disposition on the deceased's terminal return, AND the US may include the property's fair market value in the deceased's gross estate for US estate tax purposes under IRC §2101 if the deceased was a US citizen or domiciliary. The Canada-US Tax Treaty (Article XXIX-B) provides credits to avoid true double taxation, but the credit mechanism is complex — the estate may need to file both a Canadian terminal return and a US Form 706 or 706-NA, and the credits are not automatic.
  • 5The executor's timeline from date of death to final distribution typically runs 8–18 months when Section 116 is involved. The critical bottleneck is CRA processing of the T2062 application: 8–16 weeks for straightforward cases, longer if CRA requests additional information or if the property valuation is disputed. During this period, the 25% holdback remains frozen. Executors who attempt to distribute early to satisfy impatient non-resident heirs expose themselves to personal liability under subsection 116(5).
  • 6BC-specific: the Property Transfer Tax (PTT) of 1–3% applies on transfers of real property in BC, including certain estate transfers. If the property is transferred to the heir rather than sold, the PTT may apply at the property's fair market value — an additional $17,000–$26,000 on a $900,000 property depending on whether the general or additional foreign buyer rate applies. Non-resident heirs who are not Canadian citizens or permanent residents may also trigger the additional 20% foreign buyer PTT in designated areas — though estate transfers have specific exemptions that must be carefully navigated.

Quick Summary

This article covers 6 key points about key takeaways, providing essential insights for informed decision-making.

How Section 116 Works: The Non-Resident Disposition Tax

Section 116 of the Income Tax Act exists because CRA has limited enforcement power over non-residents who sell Canadian property and leave the country with the proceeds. The mechanism is simple and brutal: any person who pays a non-resident for taxable Canadian property must withhold 25% of the gross sale price and remit it to CRA — unless the non-resident first obtains a clearance certificate by filing Form T2062 and paying (or securing) the estimated tax.

In the estate context, this creates a freeze on distribution. When Margaret dies in Vancouver and her sole heir James lives in Seattle, the BC rental property undergoes a deemed disposition at fair market value on her terminal return. The capital gain and CCA recapture are calculated and taxed on Margaret's final T1. But when the estate tries to distribute the sale proceeds (or transfer the property) to James, Section 116 kicks in — and 25% of the gross value stays frozen until CRA issues the certificate.

The 25% Holdback Trap: It's on Gross, Not Net

The most common mistake executors make is assuming the 25% holdback applies to the capital gain. It does not. On a $900,000 property, the holdback is 25% × $900,000 = $225,000 — regardless of whether the actual tax owing is $86,500 or $150,000. The holdback is a security deposit, not a tax payment. The excess is refunded only after the clearance certificate is issued and the actual tax is assessed. This means $225,000 of the heir's inheritance is frozen — earning no interest — for the entire 8–18 month processing period.

The $900,000 BC Rental Property: Breaking Down the Numbers

Margaret purchased the Burnaby rental property in 2011 for $700,000: $300,000 allocated to land and $400,000 to the building. Over 15 years, she claimed Capital Cost Allowance on the building at the standard Class 1 rate of 4% (declining balance), reducing the undepreciated capital cost (UCC) from $400,000 to $280,000. The property's fair market value at death in March 2026: $900,000 ($300,000 land + $600,000 building).

Deemed Disposition at Death: Land and Building Separately

ComponentLandBuildingTotal
Fair Market Value at Death$300,000$600,000$900,000
Adjusted Cost Base / Original Cost$300,000$400,000$700,000
UCC (Building Only)n/a$280,000
Capital Gain$0$200,000$200,000
CCA Recapture (Ordinary Income)$0$120,000$120,000
Taxable Capital Gain (2/3 inclusion)$0~$133,333~$133,333

Land does not depreciate and cannot generate CCA recapture. The building produces both a capital gain (FMV above original cost) and CCA recapture (original cost above UCC). These are two separate income inclusions on the terminal return — the recapture at full marginal rates, the capital gain at the inclusion rate.

CCA Recapture: The Hidden Tax Event Executors Miss

Many executors — and even some accountants — focus exclusively on the capital gain and overlook CCA recapture. This is a costly mistake. CCA recapture under subsection 13(1) is ordinary income, not a capital gain. It does not benefit from the capital gains inclusion rate. Every dollar of recapture is taxed at the deceased's full marginal rate.

In Margaret's case, the $120,000 CCA recapture is taxed as ordinary income stacked on top of her other income. At a combined federal and BC marginal rate of approximately 45–49% on income in the $150,000–$250,000 range, the recapture alone produces approximately $54,000–$59,000 in tax. This is on top of the capital gains tax on the $200,000 gain.

Why Claiming CCA on a Rental Property Creates a Future Tax Problem at Death

CCA is not a permanent tax deduction — it is a tax deferral. Every dollar of CCA claimed during the owner's lifetime reduces the UCC and increases the CCA recapture at death. Margaret saved approximately $54,000 in tax by claiming CCA over 15 years — but the recapture at death claws back most of that benefit in a single year at the highest marginal rates. The deferral has value (the time value of money over 15 years), but executors and heirs are often surprised by the size of the recapture bill. For estate planning purposes, some advisors recommend that elderly property owners stop claiming CCA in their final years to reduce the recapture at death — though this requires predicting the timing of death, which is obviously impractical.

The Terminal Return Tax Bill: Putting It All Together

Margaret had $40,000 in other income (pension, investments) in 2026 before her death. Adding the rental property's deemed disposition:

Margaret's Terminal Return: Total Tax Owing

Income SourceAmountTax Treatment
Other income (pension, investments)$40,000Ordinary income
CCA recapture on building$120,000Ordinary income
Taxable capital gain on building~$133,3332/3 inclusion rate
Total income on terminal return~$293,333
Federal tax~$58,000Progressive rates to 33%
BC provincial tax~$28,500Progressive rates to 20.5%
Total terminal return tax~$86,500

BC's top provincial rate of 20.5% applies on income above $252,752. Combined with the federal rate, Margaret's effective marginal rate on income in this range is approximately 53.5%. The blended effective rate on the full $293,333 is lower because the first ~$55,867 is taxed at the lowest federal bracket.

The Section 116 Process: Filing T2062 and T2062A

The executor must file two forms with CRA to obtain the clearance certificate:

  • Form T2062 — Notice of Disposition of Taxable Canadian Property by a Non-Resident: Covers the non-depreciable property (the land). Reports the disposition proceeds, the ACB, and the estimated tax. Must be filed within 10 days of the disposition — in the estate context, this means within 10 days of the sale closing or the property transfer to the heir.
  • Form T2062A — Notice of Disposition of Depreciable Taxable Canadian Property by a Non-Resident: Covers the depreciable property (the building). Reports the proceeds, the original cost, the UCC, and the estimated CCA recapture and capital gain. Same 10-day filing deadline.
  • Payment or security: The T2062/T2062A must be accompanied by either full payment of the estimated tax or acceptable security (typically a bank letter of guarantee or a cash deposit with CRA). Without payment or security, CRA will not process the certificate.
  • Late filing penalty: If the T2062 is filed more than 10 days after the disposition, CRA may assess a penalty of $25 per day, up to a maximum of $2,500. The penalty is modest, but late filing also delays the clearance certificate — extending the holdback period.

Pro Tip: File the T2062 Before the Sale Closes

CRA allows "proposed disposition" filings — you can submit the T2062 before the property is actually sold, based on the expected sale price. This starts the processing clock earlier. For a $900,000 property where the executor expects an 8–16 week CRA processing time, filing the T2062 the day the listing agreement is signed (rather than waiting for the sale to close) can save 2–4 months on the overall timeline. The certificate is issued based on the proposed disposition amount — if the actual sale price differs materially, an amended T2062 may be required.

US-Resident Heirs: The Canada-US Treaty Interaction

When the non-resident heir is a US resident (like James in our example), the Canada-US Tax Treaty adds complexity. The key interactions:

  • Canadian tax is preserved: Article XIII of the Treaty gives Canada full taxing rights on gains from real property situated in Canada. The US cannot override Canada's right to tax the deemed disposition.
  • US estate tax on the deceased: If the deceased (Margaret) was NOT a US citizen or domiciliary, US estate tax does not apply to her worldwide estate. James inherits with no US estate tax exposure on Margaret's assets. However, if Margaret had been a US citizen living in Canada, her worldwide estate — including the BC rental — would be subject to US estate tax (with a $13.61 million exemption for 2026 under current law).
  • James's future US reporting: As a US person, James must report the BC rental property on his US return going forward. Rental income is reported on Schedule E. On future sale, James claims foreign tax credits for Canadian tax paid under the Treaty — but the credit mechanism requires filing IRS Form 1116 and cannot exceed the US tax attributable to the foreign-source income.
  • FBAR and FATCA: If James holds the rental property through a Canadian bank account or receives rental income in a Canadian account, the account may be reportable on FBAR (FinCEN 114) and FATCA (Form 8938) if thresholds are met.

UK-Resident Heirs: The Inheritance Tax Complication

If the non-resident heir is a UK resident, a different treaty applies: the Canada-UK Tax Convention. The UK imposes Inheritance Tax (IHT) at 40% on the worldwide estate of UK-domiciled individuals, with a nil-rate band of £325,000. The critical question is whether the deceased was UK-domiciled — not the heir.

If Margaret was Canadian-domiciled (never lived in the UK), UK IHT does not apply to her estate — regardless of where James lives. The BC rental property is situated in Canada, outside UK IHT jurisdiction for non-UK-domiciled decedents. James pays only the Canadian terminal return tax plus whatever arises from the Section 116 process.

But if Margaret was UK-domiciled (born in the UK, deemed domiciled under the 15-of-20-year rule), the BC property may be included in her UK taxable estate. Canada taxes the deemed disposition as income tax; the UK taxes the transfer as inheritance tax. The Canada-UK Convention provides credits to reduce double taxation, but the credit interaction between an income tax and an inheritance tax is imperfect — specialist cross-border advice is not optional, it is essential.

The Executor's Personal Liability: Why This Cannot Be Delegated

Subsection 116(5) imposes personal liability on the executor who distributes to a non-resident without a clearance certificate. This is not a theoretical risk — CRA actively assesses executors who distribute prematurely. The liability is 25% of the gross amount distributed, and it is a primary obligation, not a secondary guarantee. CRA can assess the executor directly without first pursuing the non-resident heir.

Real-World Scenario: Executor Distributes $900,000 Without a Certificate

The executor sells the BC rental for $900,000 and sends the full proceeds to James in Seattle, believing the terminal return tax payment covers everything. CRA discovers the distribution 18 months later during a non-resident compliance review. CRA assesses the executor personally for 25% × $900,000 = $225,000 under subsection 116(5). The executor cannot offset this against the terminal return tax already paid — they are separate obligations. The executor must pay $225,000 to CRA and then attempt to recover from James through a civil claim in a US court. Even if successful, the legal costs and delay make this a catastrophic outcome. Estate lawyers in BC universally refuse to release funds to non-resident heirs without a Section 116 certificate for exactly this reason.

BC-Specific Costs: Property Transfer Tax and Probate

Beyond the federal income tax issues, BC imposes additional costs that affect the net inheritance:

  • BC Probate Fees: BC charges probate fees (estate administration tax) at approximately 1.4% on the value of the estate above $50,000. On a $900,000 property: approximately $12,600. If the property is the estate's primary asset, probate is unavoidable unless the property was held in joint tenancy (which creates its own complications for non-resident heirs). Compare this to Alberta's flat $525 probate fee — a significant difference.
  • Property Transfer Tax (PTT): If the property is transferred to James (rather than sold to a third party), BC's PTT applies at 1% on the first $200,000, 2% on the next $1.8 million = approximately $16,000 on a $900,000 transfer. Estate transfers to beneficiaries named in the will are generally exempt from the additional 20% foreign buyer PTT — but the exemption must be properly claimed, and errors can result in a surprise $180,000 foreign buyer tax assessment.
  • Speculation and Vacancy Tax: If the rental property sits vacant during the estate administration period (no tenants), it may be subject to BC's Speculation and Vacancy Tax — approximately 2% of assessed value annually for foreign owners and satellite families. The executor should maintain tenancy or apply for an exemption based on the estate administration period.

What James Actually Receives: The Net Inheritance Calculation

Net Proceeds to Non-Resident Heir After All Taxes and Costs

ItemAmount
Property sale proceeds (gross)$900,000
Less: Terminal return tax (capital gain + CCA recapture)−$86,500
Less: BC probate fees−$12,600
Less: Estate legal and accounting fees (estimated)−$15,000
Less: Property appraisal, real estate commission (5%)−$47,000
Net proceeds to James~$738,900
Effective total cost (taxes + fees + commissions)~$161,100 (17.9% of FMV)

This assumes the property is sold at the $900,000 appraised value. If the property sells for more or less, the capital gain and tax change accordingly. The real estate commission is an optional cost — James could sell privately — but the legal, tax, and probate costs are unavoidable. The 25% holdback ($225,000) is not a permanent cost — it is refunded once the clearance certificate is issued. But it freezes James's access to those funds for 3–12 months.

Executor Timeline: Date of Death to Final Distribution

The Section 116 clearance certificate is the bottleneck in every non-resident estate involving Canadian real property. Here is the realistic timeline:

TimelineActionStatus
Week 0Death occurs — secure property, notify tenants, engage estate lawyerImmediate
Weeks 1–4Obtain death certificate, order appraisal, apply for BC probateIn progress
Weeks 4–8Receive appraisal, calculate tax, file T2062/T2062A with CRACritical filing
Weeks 8–12List and sell property (or decide on in-kind transfer), obtain probate grantActive
Weeks 12–24CRA processes Section 116 application — 25% holdback frozenWaiting on CRA
Weeks 24–36Certificate received, holdback released, terminal return assessedNearing completion
Weeks 36–52Final distribution to non-resident heir, estate closedComplete

Total realistic timeline: 8–18 months. The fastest estates (clean valuation, no CRA queries, prompt filing) close in 8–10 months. Estates with valuation disputes, missing CCA records, or incomplete T2062 filings can take 18+ months.

Strategies to Minimize the Section 116 Delay

While the Section 116 process cannot be avoided when a non-resident inherits Canadian real property, several strategies can reduce the delay and the holdback impact:

  • File the T2062 as a proposed disposition: Do not wait for the sale to close. File the T2062 based on the appraised value as soon as the appraisal is complete — even before listing the property. This starts CRA's processing clock months earlier.
  • Pay the estimated tax with the T2062: CRA processes applications with full payment faster than those with letters of guarantee or no payment. Include a cheque for the estimated capital gains tax and CCA recapture tax with the T2062 filing.
  • Engage a tax professional experienced with Section 116: CRA returns incomplete or incorrectly filed T2062s — each round trip adds 4–8 weeks. A cross-border tax accountant who regularly files Section 116 applications can avoid common errors that cause delays.
  • Keep CCA records immaculate: CRA frequently questions CCA recapture calculations. If the deceased's CCA schedules are incomplete or inconsistent with prior tax returns, CRA will request clarification — adding weeks or months to processing.
  • Consider selling to a Canadian resident: If the property is sold to a Canadian resident buyer (rather than transferred in kind to the non-resident heir), the process is more straightforward — the buyer's lawyer handles the 25% holdback mechanically, and the clearance certificate releases the holdback directly to the estate for distribution.

The Best Outcome: Spousal Rollover Eliminates Section 116 Entirely

If Margaret had a surviving Canadian-resident spouse, the property could roll over at the deceased's ACB under subsection 70(6) — no deemed disposition, no capital gain, no CCA recapture, and no Section 116 certificate required. The entire $900,000 property transfers tax-free to the spouse, who inherits the ACB and UCC for future disposition. This is the single most powerful tax planning tool in Canadian estate law — and it is completely unavailable when the heir is a non-resident non-spouse. The $86,500+ tax bill and the 8–18 month Section 116 delay are the price of not having a qualifying Canadian-resident spouse.

The Bottom Line: What Every Executor Must Know

When a Canadian estate includes real property and the heir is a non-resident, the executor's role transforms from administrator to personal guarantor. Section 116 makes the executor personally liable for the non-resident's Canadian tax if the clearance certificate is not obtained before distribution. On a $900,000 BC rental property with $300,000 ACB and $120,000 in CCA recapture, the total tax exceeds $86,500, the 25% holdback freezes $225,000 for months, and the timeline from death to final distribution stretches to 8–18 months.

The executor who understands Section 116 files the T2062 early, pays the estimated tax upfront, and manages the heir's expectations about timing. The executor who does not understand Section 116 either distributes prematurely (creating personal liability) or delays unnecessarily (creating family conflict). Neither outcome is acceptable. For estates with non-resident heirs and Canadian real property, cross-border tax advice is not a luxury — it is a legal necessity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q:What is a Section 116 clearance certificate and when is it required?

A:A Section 116 clearance certificate is a document issued by CRA confirming that a non-resident vendor of taxable Canadian property has either paid or made adequate security for the Canadian tax arising on the disposition. It is required under Section 116 of the Income Tax Act whenever a non-resident disposes of — or is deemed to dispose of — taxable Canadian property. In the estate context, the deemed disposition at death under subsection 70(5) triggers Section 116 if the property will ultimately be distributed to or sold on behalf of a non-resident heir. The certificate is obtained by filing Form T2062 (and T2062A for depreciable property) with the CRA, along with payment or acceptable security for the estimated tax. Without the certificate, any person making a payment to the non-resident in respect of the property must withhold 25% of the gross proceeds and remit it to CRA. The certificate releases the holdback obligation.

Q:How long does CRA take to process a Section 116 clearance certificate?

A:CRA's published service standard for processing T2062 applications is 60 business days (approximately 12 weeks) from receipt of a complete application with full payment or adequate security. In practice, processing times vary significantly: straightforward applications with a clear valuation and full payment can be processed in 8–10 weeks; complex applications involving disputed valuations, multiple properties, or incomplete documentation can take 6–12 months. CRA may issue interim requests for additional information, which restart portions of the processing timeline. During the 2025–2026 period, CRA's non-resident compliance division has experienced increased volume, and anecdotal reports from tax practitioners suggest average processing times closer to 14–18 weeks for estate-related applications. The executor should file the T2062 as early as possible after death — ideally within 30 days of obtaining a property appraisal — to minimize the distribution delay.

Q:What happens if the executor distributes estate funds to the non-resident heir without a clearance certificate?

A:Under subsection 116(5) of the Income Tax Act, if a person pays or credits an amount to a non-resident in respect of a disposition of taxable Canadian property and a clearance certificate has not been issued, the payer is personally liable to pay CRA 25% of the gross amount paid. This liability falls on whoever makes the payment — which in an estate context means the executor, the estate's lawyer, or the notary handling the transaction. The liability is joint and several with the non-resident's actual tax liability, meaning CRA can collect from either the executor or the non-resident, whichever is easier. In practice, CRA pursues the executor because the executor is in Canada and the non-resident may not be. The executor cannot recover this amount from the non-resident as a matter of right — they may need to pursue a civil claim in a foreign jurisdiction. This personal liability is the primary reason estate lawyers refuse to release funds without a Section 116 certificate.

Q:Does the 25% holdback apply to the gross sale price or the net capital gain?

A:The 25% holdback under subsection 116(5) applies to the gross sale price (or the fair market value in a deemed disposition), not the net capital gain. On a $900,000 property with a $300,000 ACB, the holdback is 25% × $900,000 = $225,000 — even though the actual capital gains tax may be substantially less. This over-withholding is by design: CRA wants security for the maximum possible tax, and the clearance certificate process is how the non-resident recovers any excess. If the non-resident files the T2062 with full payment of the estimated actual tax (e.g., $120,000), CRA may issue the certificate with only that amount secured, releasing the excess holdback. But if no T2062 is filed, the full 25% of gross proceeds remains frozen. The over-withholding creates a significant cash flow problem for non-resident heirs who may wait months to recover the excess.

Q:How does CCA recapture work on the terminal return for a deceased landlord?

A:When the deceased owned a rental property and claimed Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) during their lifetime, the undepreciated capital cost (UCC) of the building is lower than its original cost. On the deemed disposition at death under subsection 70(5), the difference between the UCC and the lesser of (a) the original capital cost of the building or (b) the fair market value of the building at death is included as CCA recapture — ordinary income on the terminal return under subsection 13(1). This is separate from the capital gain. For example: building originally cost $400,000, UCC at death is $280,000, FMV at death is $600,000. CCA recapture = $400,000 − $280,000 = $120,000 (ordinary income). Capital gain on building = $600,000 − $400,000 = $200,000. The recapture is taxed at the deceased's full marginal rate (up to 53.5% combined in BC for 2026), while the capital gain is taxed at the inclusion rate. The recapture significantly increases the terminal return tax bill beyond what a simple capital gains calculation would suggest.

Q:Can a non-resident heir avoid Section 116 by inheriting the property and not selling it?

A:No — and this is a common misconception. Section 116 is triggered by a 'disposition' of taxable Canadian property, and the deemed disposition at death under subsection 70(5) is a disposition for these purposes — regardless of whether the property is actually sold. Even if the non-resident heir intends to keep the property as a rental investment in Canada, the deemed disposition on the deceased's terminal return has already occurred. However, the Section 116 certificate requirement specifically applies to the payment of proceeds to the non-resident. If the property is transferred in kind to the non-resident heir (rather than sold and proceeds distributed), the executor should still file the T2062 to clear the deemed disposition, but the holdback mechanics are different — there are no 'proceeds' being paid to the non-resident, so the 25% holdback applies to the fair market value of the property transferred. The executor must still ensure the terminal return tax is paid before distributing the property.

Question: What is a Section 116 clearance certificate and when is it required?

Answer: A Section 116 clearance certificate is a document issued by CRA confirming that a non-resident vendor of taxable Canadian property has either paid or made adequate security for the Canadian tax arising on the disposition. It is required under Section 116 of the Income Tax Act whenever a non-resident disposes of — or is deemed to dispose of — taxable Canadian property. In the estate context, the deemed disposition at death under subsection 70(5) triggers Section 116 if the property will ultimately be distributed to or sold on behalf of a non-resident heir. The certificate is obtained by filing Form T2062 (and T2062A for depreciable property) with the CRA, along with payment or acceptable security for the estimated tax. Without the certificate, any person making a payment to the non-resident in respect of the property must withhold 25% of the gross proceeds and remit it to CRA. The certificate releases the holdback obligation.

Question: How long does CRA take to process a Section 116 clearance certificate?

Answer: CRA's published service standard for processing T2062 applications is 60 business days (approximately 12 weeks) from receipt of a complete application with full payment or adequate security. In practice, processing times vary significantly: straightforward applications with a clear valuation and full payment can be processed in 8–10 weeks; complex applications involving disputed valuations, multiple properties, or incomplete documentation can take 6–12 months. CRA may issue interim requests for additional information, which restart portions of the processing timeline. During the 2025–2026 period, CRA's non-resident compliance division has experienced increased volume, and anecdotal reports from tax practitioners suggest average processing times closer to 14–18 weeks for estate-related applications. The executor should file the T2062 as early as possible after death — ideally within 30 days of obtaining a property appraisal — to minimize the distribution delay.

Question: What happens if the executor distributes estate funds to the non-resident heir without a clearance certificate?

Answer: Under subsection 116(5) of the Income Tax Act, if a person pays or credits an amount to a non-resident in respect of a disposition of taxable Canadian property and a clearance certificate has not been issued, the payer is personally liable to pay CRA 25% of the gross amount paid. This liability falls on whoever makes the payment — which in an estate context means the executor, the estate's lawyer, or the notary handling the transaction. The liability is joint and several with the non-resident's actual tax liability, meaning CRA can collect from either the executor or the non-resident, whichever is easier. In practice, CRA pursues the executor because the executor is in Canada and the non-resident may not be. The executor cannot recover this amount from the non-resident as a matter of right — they may need to pursue a civil claim in a foreign jurisdiction. This personal liability is the primary reason estate lawyers refuse to release funds without a Section 116 certificate.

Question: Does the 25% holdback apply to the gross sale price or the net capital gain?

Answer: The 25% holdback under subsection 116(5) applies to the gross sale price (or the fair market value in a deemed disposition), not the net capital gain. On a $900,000 property with a $300,000 ACB, the holdback is 25% × $900,000 = $225,000 — even though the actual capital gains tax may be substantially less. This over-withholding is by design: CRA wants security for the maximum possible tax, and the clearance certificate process is how the non-resident recovers any excess. If the non-resident files the T2062 with full payment of the estimated actual tax (e.g., $120,000), CRA may issue the certificate with only that amount secured, releasing the excess holdback. But if no T2062 is filed, the full 25% of gross proceeds remains frozen. The over-withholding creates a significant cash flow problem for non-resident heirs who may wait months to recover the excess.

Question: How does CCA recapture work on the terminal return for a deceased landlord?

Answer: When the deceased owned a rental property and claimed Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) during their lifetime, the undepreciated capital cost (UCC) of the building is lower than its original cost. On the deemed disposition at death under subsection 70(5), the difference between the UCC and the lesser of (a) the original capital cost of the building or (b) the fair market value of the building at death is included as CCA recapture — ordinary income on the terminal return under subsection 13(1). This is separate from the capital gain. For example: building originally cost $400,000, UCC at death is $280,000, FMV at death is $600,000. CCA recapture = $400,000 − $280,000 = $120,000 (ordinary income). Capital gain on building = $600,000 − $400,000 = $200,000. The recapture is taxed at the deceased's full marginal rate (up to 53.5% combined in BC for 2026), while the capital gain is taxed at the inclusion rate. The recapture significantly increases the terminal return tax bill beyond what a simple capital gains calculation would suggest.

Question: Can a non-resident heir avoid Section 116 by inheriting the property and not selling it?

Answer: No — and this is a common misconception. Section 116 is triggered by a 'disposition' of taxable Canadian property, and the deemed disposition at death under subsection 70(5) is a disposition for these purposes — regardless of whether the property is actually sold. Even if the non-resident heir intends to keep the property as a rental investment in Canada, the deemed disposition on the deceased's terminal return has already occurred. However, the Section 116 certificate requirement specifically applies to the payment of proceeds to the non-resident. If the property is transferred in kind to the non-resident heir (rather than sold and proceeds distributed), the executor should still file the T2062 to clear the deemed disposition, but the holdback mechanics are different — there are no 'proceeds' being paid to the non-resident, so the 25% holdback applies to the fair market value of the property transferred. The executor must still ensure the terminal return tax is paid before distributing the property.

Related Articles

Ready to Take Control of Your Financial Future?

Get personalized inheritance planning advice from Toronto's trusted financial advisors.

Schedule Your Free Consultation
Back to Blog