Best Halal Growth ETFs in Canada 2026: 4 Shariah Picks Ranked by 5-Year Return

David Kumar
12 min read

Quick Answer

The best halal growth ETFs for Canadian Muslim investors in 2026: SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia, 0.45% fee, 17.39% annualized 5-year return through May 2026, $2.07B AUM) ranks first — it outpaced the S&P 500 total return by roughly 3 percentage points per year over five years because the screen removes banks and adds semiconductor and tech weight. HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah, 0.50%) is the closest alternative with broader mid-cap coverage. WSHR (Wealthsimple Shariah World, 0.56% MER, CAD-listed) adds global reach in Canadian dollars. SPWO (SP Funds World ex-US, 0.55%) pairs with SPUS for international diversification. All four use AAOIFI-aligned Shariah screening.

Key Takeaways

  • 1SPUS delivered 17.39% annualized over 5 years (through May 31, 2026 vs 14.15% for the S&P 500 total return index) — the screen's removal of banks and insurers structurally tilts the fund toward semiconductors and technology, sectors that led the last growth cycle
  • 2The compliance premium costs 25 basis points versus XEQT (SPUS 0.45% vs XEQT 0.20%) — on a $100,000 portfolio that is $250 per year, or roughly $12,000 over 25 years at 7% growth, less than one year of the performance gap the fund has actually delivered
  • 3RRSP is the correct home for US-listed halal ETFs (SPUS, HLAL, SPWO): the Canada-US tax treaty eliminates the 15% withholding tax on distributions; TFSA holders pay 15% on every distribution with no recovery
  • 4WSHR is the only CAD-listed option — no currency conversion, TFSA/RRSP/FHSA eligible, 0.56% MER all-in — and it is the right first pick if you want global halal equity without the FX friction of buying USD funds
  • 5SPWO (international ex-US, 0.55%) returned 47.60% in the 12 months to May 2026 as non-US markets caught up — pairing it with SPUS at roughly 70/30 gives you a complete halal global equity allocation
  • 6The conventional broad-market Canadian ETFs (XEQT, VEQT, ZEQT) fail the AAOIFI screen outright — the TSX financials sector is roughly 30% of the index, and no bank or insurer passes stage one of the business-activity screen

Why the Halal Growth ETF Question Is Different from the Broad Halal ETF Question

The existing guide to the best halal ETFs in Canada ranks all Shariah-compliant funds by fee and screening methodology — and it is the right starting point. This article goes one step further: it focuses specifically on Muslim Canadian investors whose primary objective is capital growth over a 10-to-25-year horizon, not current income. The growth orientation changes the ranking.

The income-tilted halal funds — SPRE (global REITs, ~4% trailing yield) and SPSK (sukuk, 4.41% SEC yield) — are excellent for a halal income sleeve. If you are building toward retirement and want cash distributions along the way, they deserve a place. But if you are in accumulation mode and measuring your portfolio by its terminal value at retirement, the funds that matter most are the ones with the highest expected long-run capital appreciation. That is SPUS, HLAL, WSHR, and SPWO — in that order.

The part most investors miss: the AAOIFI screen's removal of banks and insurers is not purely a constraint. It is a structural tilt. Strip the S&P 500's financial sector and the remaining holdings weight more heavily toward technology and semiconductors. That tilt cost investors nothing in the last five years and delivered above-index returns. The caution is that sector leadership rotates — but the compliance reason to hold a screened fund is the principle, not the track record.

The 2026 Halal Growth ETF Ranking

ETFFee (MER/ER)5-Yr Ann. Return1-Yr ReturnAUMListingScreen
SPUS0.45%17.39%40.84%$2.07BNYSE (USD)S&P/DJIM
HLAL0.50%~16-17%*n/a**~$900MNasdaq (USD)FTSE Shariah
WSHR0.56%n/a***Cboe CA (CAD)MSCI Islamic
SPWO0.55%47.60%$131MNYSE (USD)S&P/DJIM

*HLAL does not publish standardized performance data on its public fund page; the estimate is based on peer return comparison against SPUS given near-identical top holdings and similar methodology. **HLAL 1-yr standardized figure not published on public page. ***WSHR is a newer CAD-listed ETF; multi-year return history not yet available. All performance data as of May 31, 2026. Source: sp-funds.com/spus, wahed.com/uae/hlal, sp-funds.com/spwo (Firecrawl-verified June 2026). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

The S&P 500 comparison that matters

The S&P 500 total return index (SPTR) delivered 14.15% annualized over the same five-year period. SPUS's 17.39% annualized NAV return represents a 3.24 percentage-point-per-year gap in favour of the screened fund. On a $100,000 portfolio held for five years, that gap compounded into roughly $20,000 more terminal value — enough to make the 0.25 percentage-point fee premium over XEQT irrelevant. The compliance premium (SPUS 0.45% vs XEQT 0.20%) costs $250 per year on $100,000. The return premium delivered roughly $4,000 per year in additional growth on that same base. The math ran strongly in favour of the screened fund over this window. The honest disclosure: it may not over the next five years.

Pick #1: SPUS — Best Halal Growth ETF Overall

SP Funds' S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF is the flagship halal growth fund for Canadian Muslim investors for three reasons: lowest fee in the peer group (0.45%), largest asset base ($2.07 billion as of June 2026), and the most liquid trading environment of any Shariah-screened equity ETF.

The fund tracks the S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions Index, which screens the S&P 500's 500 companies down to roughly 200 by removing every company that fails either the business-activity or financial-ratio tests under the S&P Dow Jones Islamic methodology. The ratio tests use a trailing 24-month average market cap as the denominator — a feature that makes the screen more stable than methodologies that use point-in-time market cap, which can trigger unnecessary turnover during market volatility.

Top holdings as of June 23, 2026: NVIDIA (13.32%), Apple (11.49%), Microsoft (7.19%), Alphabet (5.40%), Broadcom (4.89%), Micron Technology (3.60%), Tesla (3.00%), AMD (2.37%), Eli Lilly (2.30%), Exxon Mobil (1.51%). These ten positions account for roughly 55% of the fund — concentration that comes with meaningful single-stock risk but also explains the strong recent returns. The fund paid four quarterly distributions of $0.026 per unit plus a small December top-up in 2025, for a trailing yield of approximately 0.39% as of May 31, 2026. This is a capital appreciation vehicle, not an income vehicle.

The one caution worth naming explicitly: SPUS is US-listed and denominated in USD. Canadian investors buying SPUS in a Questrade or Interactive Brokers account pay the USD conversion. If you are managing a large RRSP and want to minimize FX drag, use Norbert's gambit (buy and journal DLR.TO/DLR.U.TO) to convert CAD to USD at near-interbank rates before buying. For a TFSA, WSHR avoids this entirely.

The account-placement rule for US-listed halal ETFs: Hold SPUS and HLAL inside your RRSP first. Under Article XXI(2) of the Canada-US tax treaty, RRSP holders pay 0% US withholding tax on distributions from US-listed ETFs. TFSA and FHSA holders pay 15% on every distribution — unrecoverable. On a $100,000 SPUS position yielding 0.39%, that is roughly $59 per year lost in a TFSA versus $0 in an RRSP. The dollar amount is small for a growth fund; for income funds like SPRE or SPSK it becomes significant. Either way, the RRSP is the correct first home for any USD-listed halal ETF. The 2026 RRSP limit is $33,810 or 18% of prior-year earned income, whichever is lower.

Pick #2: HLAL — Broader US Coverage, Annual Shariah Audit Trail

Wahed Invest's FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) is the second-best halal growth fund for Canadian investors, at 0.50% — a 5 basis-point premium over SPUS. The fee difference is $50 per year on $100,000. Whether HLAL earns that premium comes down to two structural advantages: slightly broader US market coverage and a more transparent governance trail.

HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index, which screens the broader US equity market (not just S&P 500 components), typically holding 200-250 names including mid-cap companies absent from SPUS. As of June 18, 2026, the fund's NAV stood at $71.88 with roughly $900 million in AUM and 211 holdings. The top holdings as of early June 2026 are: Apple (13.51%), Microsoft (9.13%), Alphabet (6.34%), Broadcom (5.23%), Alphabet Class C (5.13%), Meta (3.86%), Tesla (3.33%), Micron (2.99%), Eli Lilly (2.55%), AMD (2.20%). Top 10 represent 54.3% of the fund.

The governance advantage: Wahed publishes annual Shariah Supervisory Board reports (2021 through 2024 available on the fund page), quarterly purification CSV files, and Yasaar Limited issues a Fatwa certifying the FTSE Shariah USA Index. That certification chain is more publicly documented than most Shariah-compliant funds. For investors who want to verify compliance rather than simply trust a label, HLAL provides the primary-source documentation.

The overlap with SPUS is the honest caveat. Both funds' largest positions cluster around the same megacap names — Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Broadcom anchor both top tens. The notable difference: Nvidia is SPUS's single largest holding (13.32%) but does not appear in HLAL's top ten, because the FTSE Shariah screen HLAL uses excluded it at the most recent rebalance. Even so, holding both does not meaningfully diversify your portfolio. HLAL is the better choice if (1) you place a high value on the Fatwa-backed certification chain, or (2) you want the mid-cap coverage that the S&P 500 screen excludes. Otherwise, pick one and hold it consistently.

Pick #3: WSHR — The CAD-Listed Option for Simple Global Halal Growth

The Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR, traded on Cboe Canada) is the most operationally convenient halal growth option for most Canadian investors. You buy it in Canadian dollars, it holds in Canadian dollars, and no FX management is required. It is available inside TFSA, RRSP, and FHSA accounts at any Canadian brokerage that carries Cboe Canada listings — including Wealthsimple Trade and Questrade.

WSHR tracks the MSCI World Islamic Index, providing global halal equity exposure with a US-tilt (approximately 70% US), international developed markets (roughly 20%), and a small Canadian-compliant equity slice (roughly 10% — the few Canadian companies that pass the AAOIFI screen, primarily Shopify and a handful of industrial names). The management fee is 0.50% with a total MER of 0.56% as of the most recent annual MRFP — not the 0.50% management fee misquoted in some comparisons.

The trade-off versus SPUS: WSHR is slightly more expensive (0.56% vs 0.45%), does not have a five-year track record yet as a standalone fund, and its quality/low-volatility index tilt means it holds somewhat more defensive names than the growth-heavy SPUS portfolio. On the other hand, WSHR provides automatic global diversification, eliminates the withholding-tax disadvantage in a TFSA (because WSHR is CAD-listed, not US-listed), and simplifies the portfolio to a single line item.

For a Muslim Canadian investor with a simple structure — max TFSA first, then RRSP, buy one fund and rebalance annually — WSHR is the most friction-free starting point. For someone already managing a self-directed portfolio at Questrade or Interactive Brokers, SPUS in the RRSP delivers better returns at a lower fee.

Pick #4: SPWO — International Growth Pair for SPUS Holders

The SP Funds S&P World (ex-US) ETF (SPWO) is not a standalone pick — it is the right complement to SPUS for investors who want a complete global halal equity allocation. SPWO tracks the S&P DM Ex-U.S. and EM 50/50 Shariah Index, which blends developed-market ex-US and emerging-market Shariah-compliant stocks in equal proportion. The fund launched December 2023 and holds roughly $131 million in assets as of June 2026.

The top 10 holdings as of June 23, 2026 show how different SPWO's portfolio is from the US-only funds: Taiwan Semiconductor (20.86%), Samsung Electronics (5.26%), SK Hynix (4.75%), ASML Holding (3.42%), Alibaba (2.61%), MediaTek (2.37%), Delta Electronics (1.38%), Roche (1.28%), Novartis (1.27%), AstraZeneca (1.26%). The fund is heavily weighted toward Asian semiconductors and European pharma — exposure that is completely absent from SPUS or HLAL.

The one-year return through May 31, 2026 was 47.60% at NAV — well above SPUS's 40.84% for the same period — because non-US markets, particularly Asia, had a strong catch-up year. That single-year figure should not be extrapolated: SPWO is a higher-volatility fund given its emerging-market component, and the 0.36% bid-ask spread (versus SPUS's 0.02%) reflects its smaller asset base and lower liquidity.

A simple two-fund halal growth portfolio

SPUS (70%) + SPWO (30%) gives you a globally diversified, fully AAOIFI-screened growth allocation in two ETFs. SPUS covers the S&P 500 Shariah universe; SPWO covers Shariah-compliant companies from the rest of the world including emerging markets. Both use S&P Dow Jones Islamic methodology, so the screening standards are consistent. Annual rebalancing back to 70/30 is sufficient — neither fund drifts dramatically over a single year. The combined MER runs roughly 0.47% (0.45% × 0.70 + 0.55% × 0.30), versus 0.20% for XEQT. That 27 basis-point gap costs $270 per year on $100,000 — the compliance premium for running a fully screened global portfolio.

Why Conventional Canadian ETFs Fail the Screen

This question comes up constantly, and the answer is worth stating plainly. XEQT, VEQT, ZEQT, and every broad-market Canadian-listed all-in-one ETF fail the AAOIFI Shariah screen before the financial ratios are even applied. The failure happens at Stage 1: the business-activity screen.

The Canadian financial sector represents roughly 30% of the S&P/TSX Composite. RBC, TD, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC, and National Bank are all conventional banks whose primary revenue comes from interest — riba under Islamic finance principles. Sun Life, Manulife, and Great-West Life are conventional insurers in the same position. Every single one of these companies fails Stage 1 outright. The fund cannot pass the overall screen while holding them, because eliminating them from the index calculation would require a restructured fund — which is what purpose-built Shariah ETFs provide.

The practical consequence: a Muslim Canadian who holds XEQT or VEQT is invested in conventional Canadian banks at scale. The solution is not to hold a Canadian-listed broad-market fund and try to screen holdings manually — it is to use a purpose-built Shariah fund. None of the picks in this article have that problem.

For a detailed comparison of ETF wrappers versus mutual fund structures, see the ETF vs Mutual Fund guide. For the full picture on what makes any ETF halal at the holdings level, see the best halal ETFs in Canada ranking, which covers the screening methodology in full. For broad low-cost index alternatives, the best index funds in Canada guide covers the conventional side.

Account Placement Summary for Canadian Muslim Investors

AccountBest Halal Growth ETFWhy
RRSP ($33,810 limit, 2026)SPUS or HLALCanada-US treaty eliminates 15% withholding on distributions; tax-deferred growth on a pre-tax contribution
TFSA ($7,000/yr, $109,000 cumulative 2026)WSHRCAD-listed — no 15% US withholding issue; tax-free growth; no currency management required
FHSA ($8,000/yr, $40,000 lifetime)WSHRSame logic as TFSA — CAD-listed, no withholding; tax-deductible contributions + tax-free growth for a first home purchase
Non-registered (taxable)SPUS (with Norbert's gambit)Foreign tax credit recovers US withholding in taxable accounts; low distribution yield means minimal annual taxable income

The Bottom Line: Which Fund to Buy

For the core of a growth-oriented halal portfolio, the decision tree is straightforward. If you have RRSP contribution room and are comfortable managing a USD position, start with SPUS — lowest fee, best documented track record, largest liquidity pool, and a 5-year annualized return that outpaced the S&P 500 without trying to. If you want CAD-listed and global with no FX overhead, WSHR is the right single fund. If you have both accounts available, the efficient structure is SPUS or HLAL inside the RRSP and WSHR inside the TFSA.

Add SPWO when you want deliberate international-ex-US exposure alongside your US-focused halal ETF. At 70% SPUS and 30% SPWO you have the entire Shariah-compliant global equity market in two funds, at a combined cost of about 0.47% per year. That is the growth halal portfolio. Everything else is optimisation.

The one thing not to do is hold a conventional Canadian broad-market ETF and assume the halal screening problem can be solved by picking a few individual stocks alongside it. The financial sector weighting in Canadian indexes is too large — roughly 30% of the TSX — for partial compliance to mean anything. If the portfolio objective is halal, the whole portfolio needs to be built from halal building blocks, and all four funds in this ranking are those building blocks.

Need help structuring a halal growth portfolio?

Which accounts to prioritize, how much to put in SPUS versus WSHR, and when to add SPWO — the right answer depends on your income, province, and existing registered room. Our planning team can run the account-placement math on your actual situation. Book a free 15-minute call — no obligation, no product sales.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q:Why did SPUS outperform the S&P 500 over five years if it pays more in fees?

A:The screen creates a structural sector tilt that happened to match the last growth cycle almost perfectly. When you remove every conventional bank and insurer from the S&P 500, you are removing its largest sector by weight and replacing that room with more of the remaining holdings — which skew heavily toward technology and semiconductors. From 2019 through 2026, that was the right bet: US semiconductor and large-cap tech names drove the strongest returns in the index. SPUS delivered 17.39% annualized over five years through May 2026, compared to 14.15% for the S&P 500 total return index — a gap of about 3.24 percentage points per year. The important caveat is that this is backwards-looking. If the next five years are led by a sector the screen keeps, the gap works in your favour. If a rotation toward financials or energy dominates, the screen could become a drag. The compliance reason to hold SPUS is not the performance track record — it is the principle. The track record is a bonus that happened to align.

Q:Is SPUS or HLAL the better halal growth ETF for Canadians?

A:For most Canadian investors, SPUS is the better core growth pick, and the margin is real but not enormous. SPUS charges 0.45% versus HLAL's 0.50% — a 5 basis-point difference that costs $50 per year on $100,000. More meaningfully, SPUS applies the S&P Dow Jones Islamic methodology, which uses a trailing 24-month average market cap as the denominator for its financial ratio tests, making it somewhat more stable quarter to quarter than the FTSE screening HLAL uses against total assets. SPUS also has significantly more assets — roughly $2.07 billion versus HLAL's approximately $900 million — giving it tighter bid-ask spreads and more liquidity on the exchange. HLAL offers slightly broader US market coverage (mid-cap names the S&P 500 does not include), and its FTSE Shariah certification from Yasaar Limited with a published annual Shariah Supervisory Board report gives some investors additional confidence in the governance trail. If you already hold SPUS and are debating whether to add HLAL, the overlap in top holdings is substantial — both are led by Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Broadcom (SPUS's largest position is Nvidia, which HLAL's FTSE screen excluded at the most recent rebalance — the clearest single difference between the two). The case for holding both is geographic diversification within US equities, not meaningful sector diversification.

Q:Should a Canadian hold SPUS and SPWO together as a complete halal portfolio?

A:Yes — SPUS plus SPWO at roughly a 70/30 or 80/20 split gives you the most straightforward complete-market halal equity allocation a Canadian can build. SPUS covers the S&P 500 Shariah screen (roughly 200 US large-cap companies passing AAOIFI tests), while SPWO covers Shariah-compliant companies from developed markets outside the US and from emerging markets. Both use S&P Dow Jones Islamic methodology, so the screening standards are consistent across the pair. The pairing removes the US home-country concentration that comes from holding only SPUS. SPWO's top holding as of June 2026 is Taiwan Semiconductor at 20.86% — a position reflecting the fund's heavy tilt toward Asian technology (TSMC, Samsung, SK Hynix, ASML, MediaTek all appear in the top 10). The risk to name plainly: both funds are US-listed in USD, so you need a Canadian brokerage account with US market access, and currency conversion applies unless you use a strategy like Norbert's gambit. WSHR is the CAD-listed alternative that bundles global halal equity in one fund if the FX management is not something you want to handle.

Q:What is the AAOIFI screen and how do these growth ETFs pass it?

A:AAOIFI Shariah Standard 21 runs in two stages. Stage one is a business-activity screen: any company earning more than 5% of its revenue from conventional finance, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, pork, adult entertainment, or weapons fails outright. This removes every Canadian and US bank, every life insurer, and every conventional finance company in the index — immediately. Stage two applies three financial-ratio tests: interest-bearing debt must be at or below 30% of market capitalization, cash plus interest-bearing securities must be at or below 30% of market cap, and impermissible income (interest income from any remaining cash holdings, for example) must be at or below 5% of total income. Most large technology companies pass these tests comfortably — Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Alphabet carry interest-bearing debt well below 30% of their market caps, and their revenue comes overwhelmingly from hardware, software, and advertising, not interest. That is exactly why the compliant funds are so tech-heavy. The screen checks compliance quarterly and removes any company that drifts across a threshold at the rebalance. For SPUS, the S&P Dow Jones Islamic methodology uses a trailing 24-month average market cap as the denominator, which smooths out short-term valuation swings.

Q:Can Canadians buy SPUS, HLAL, and SPWO in a TFSA or RRSP?

A:Yes, all three are US-listed ETFs that any Canadian brokerage account with US market access can hold inside a TFSA, RRSP, FHSA, or non-registered account. The critical tax difference is withholding. In an RRSP, the Canada-US tax treaty (Article XXI(2)) exempts dividends paid by US-listed ETFs from the standard 15% US withholding tax — meaning distributions land in the RRSP gross. In a TFSA or FHSA, the CRA does not recognize those accounts as treaty-eligible retirement accounts, so the IRS takes 15% of every distribution before it reaches you, and that 15% is not recoverable. For growth ETFs like SPUS and HLAL, which yield under 0.5% annualized, the dollar impact of withholding is small — on a $100,000 position yielding 0.4%, the unrecoverable withholding in a TFSA is roughly $60 per year. For the TFSA contribution room ($7,000 for 2026, $109,000 cumulative since 2009) and the RRSP dollar cap ($33,810 for 2026), the account you choose matters far more than which specific halal growth ETF you pick.

Q:Is WSHR a growth ETF or an income ETF?

A:WSHR is best described as a global halal equity ETF with a quality/low-volatility tilt — it is neither a pure growth fund nor a dividend fund. The MSCI World Islamic Index it tracks filters for Shariah compliance and then applies a quality screen that ends up owning lower-volatility names with steadier fundamentals. In practice, WSHR holds companies like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Johnson and Johnson, and Nestle alongside tech names, giving it a somewhat more defensive character than SPUS or HLAL. It paid $0.40 per unit in distributions for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025 on a NAV of roughly $31.94, which is a trailing yield of about 1.25% — higher than SPUS's 0.39% but well below an income-focused fund. If you want capital growth with a global Shariah-compliant approach and no FX management overhead, WSHR is the right pick. If you specifically want maximum growth potential and are comfortable managing USD, SPUS plus SPWO gives you more upside tilt.

Q:Do I need to purify my returns from halal growth ETFs?

A:Yes. Passing the AAOIFI screen does not mean a company earns zero non-permissible income — the Stage 2 test allows up to 5% of total income from non-compliant sources, typically interest on corporate cash balances or other incidental impure revenues. The fraction of your return attributable to that incidental income must be donated to charity (purification). The amount is small for growth ETFs: technology companies earn most of their revenue from products and services, so purification ratios are typically a fraction of a percent of distributions received. SP Funds publishes a quarterly purification calculator at sp-funds.com/purification-calculator covering SPUS (and SPWO). Wahed publishes quarterly HLAL purification reports at wahed.com. If you receive very few distributions from a growth ETF held primarily for capital appreciation, your purification obligation in a given year may be negligible — but the obligation exists even if distributions are reinvested, because AAOIFI methodology requires purifying income regardless of whether it was paid out as dividends.

Q:How does SPWO differ from WSHR for international exposure?

A:SPWO and WSHR both provide international halal equity exposure, but their construction is different. SPWO tracks the S&P DM Ex-U.S. and EM 50/50 Shariah Index — a roughly equal blend of developed-market ex-US and emerging-market Shariah-compliant stocks, with Taiwan Semiconductor alone making up 20.86% of the fund as of June 2026. It is US-listed, trades in USD, and charges 0.55%. WSHR tracks the MSCI World Islamic Index, which is dominated by US companies (approximately 70% US weight) with international developed markets making up the remainder — it has minimal emerging-market exposure. WSHR is CAD-listed on Cboe Canada, charges 0.56% MER, and is available directly in Canadian dollars without FX management. The practical rule: if you want dedicated international-ex-US exposure as a complement to a US halal ETF like SPUS, SPWO is the more focused tool. If you want a single global halal equity fund that is simple to buy and hold in CAD, WSHR works for that.

Question: Why did SPUS outperform the S&P 500 over five years if it pays more in fees?

Answer: The screen creates a structural sector tilt that happened to match the last growth cycle almost perfectly. When you remove every conventional bank and insurer from the S&P 500, you are removing its largest sector by weight and replacing that room with more of the remaining holdings — which skew heavily toward technology and semiconductors. From 2019 through 2026, that was the right bet: US semiconductor and large-cap tech names drove the strongest returns in the index. SPUS delivered 17.39% annualized over five years through May 2026, compared to 14.15% for the S&P 500 total return index — a gap of about 3.24 percentage points per year. The important caveat is that this is backwards-looking. If the next five years are led by a sector the screen keeps, the gap works in your favour. If a rotation toward financials or energy dominates, the screen could become a drag. The compliance reason to hold SPUS is not the performance track record — it is the principle. The track record is a bonus that happened to align.

Question: Is SPUS or HLAL the better halal growth ETF for Canadians?

Answer: For most Canadian investors, SPUS is the better core growth pick, and the margin is real but not enormous. SPUS charges 0.45% versus HLAL's 0.50% — a 5 basis-point difference that costs $50 per year on $100,000. More meaningfully, SPUS applies the S&P Dow Jones Islamic methodology, which uses a trailing 24-month average market cap as the denominator for its financial ratio tests, making it somewhat more stable quarter to quarter than the FTSE screening HLAL uses against total assets. SPUS also has significantly more assets — roughly $2.07 billion versus HLAL's approximately $900 million — giving it tighter bid-ask spreads and more liquidity on the exchange. HLAL offers slightly broader US market coverage (mid-cap names the S&P 500 does not include), and its FTSE Shariah certification from Yasaar Limited with a published annual Shariah Supervisory Board report gives some investors additional confidence in the governance trail. If you already hold SPUS and are debating whether to add HLAL, the overlap in top holdings is substantial — both are led by Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Broadcom (SPUS's largest position is Nvidia, which HLAL's FTSE screen excluded at the most recent rebalance — the clearest single difference between the two). The case for holding both is geographic diversification within US equities, not meaningful sector diversification.

Question: Should a Canadian hold SPUS and SPWO together as a complete halal portfolio?

Answer: Yes — SPUS plus SPWO at roughly a 70/30 or 80/20 split gives you the most straightforward complete-market halal equity allocation a Canadian can build. SPUS covers the S&P 500 Shariah screen (roughly 200 US large-cap companies passing AAOIFI tests), while SPWO covers Shariah-compliant companies from developed markets outside the US and from emerging markets. Both use S&P Dow Jones Islamic methodology, so the screening standards are consistent across the pair. The pairing removes the US home-country concentration that comes from holding only SPUS. SPWO's top holding as of June 2026 is Taiwan Semiconductor at 20.86% — a position reflecting the fund's heavy tilt toward Asian technology (TSMC, Samsung, SK Hynix, ASML, MediaTek all appear in the top 10). The risk to name plainly: both funds are US-listed in USD, so you need a Canadian brokerage account with US market access, and currency conversion applies unless you use a strategy like Norbert's gambit. WSHR is the CAD-listed alternative that bundles global halal equity in one fund if the FX management is not something you want to handle.

Question: What is the AAOIFI screen and how do these growth ETFs pass it?

Answer: AAOIFI Shariah Standard 21 runs in two stages. Stage one is a business-activity screen: any company earning more than 5% of its revenue from conventional finance, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, pork, adult entertainment, or weapons fails outright. This removes every Canadian and US bank, every life insurer, and every conventional finance company in the index — immediately. Stage two applies three financial-ratio tests: interest-bearing debt must be at or below 30% of market capitalization, cash plus interest-bearing securities must be at or below 30% of market cap, and impermissible income (interest income from any remaining cash holdings, for example) must be at or below 5% of total income. Most large technology companies pass these tests comfortably — Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Alphabet carry interest-bearing debt well below 30% of their market caps, and their revenue comes overwhelmingly from hardware, software, and advertising, not interest. That is exactly why the compliant funds are so tech-heavy. The screen checks compliance quarterly and removes any company that drifts across a threshold at the rebalance. For SPUS, the S&P Dow Jones Islamic methodology uses a trailing 24-month average market cap as the denominator, which smooths out short-term valuation swings.

Question: Can Canadians buy SPUS, HLAL, and SPWO in a TFSA or RRSP?

Answer: Yes, all three are US-listed ETFs that any Canadian brokerage account with US market access can hold inside a TFSA, RRSP, FHSA, or non-registered account. The critical tax difference is withholding. In an RRSP, the Canada-US tax treaty (Article XXI(2)) exempts dividends paid by US-listed ETFs from the standard 15% US withholding tax — meaning distributions land in the RRSP gross. In a TFSA or FHSA, the CRA does not recognize those accounts as treaty-eligible retirement accounts, so the IRS takes 15% of every distribution before it reaches you, and that 15% is not recoverable. For growth ETFs like SPUS and HLAL, which yield under 0.5% annualized, the dollar impact of withholding is small — on a $100,000 position yielding 0.4%, the unrecoverable withholding in a TFSA is roughly $60 per year. For the TFSA contribution room ($7,000 for 2026, $109,000 cumulative since 2009) and the RRSP dollar cap ($33,810 for 2026), the account you choose matters far more than which specific halal growth ETF you pick.

Question: Is WSHR a growth ETF or an income ETF?

Answer: WSHR is best described as a global halal equity ETF with a quality/low-volatility tilt — it is neither a pure growth fund nor a dividend fund. The MSCI World Islamic Index it tracks filters for Shariah compliance and then applies a quality screen that ends up owning lower-volatility names with steadier fundamentals. In practice, WSHR holds companies like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Johnson and Johnson, and Nestle alongside tech names, giving it a somewhat more defensive character than SPUS or HLAL. It paid $0.40 per unit in distributions for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025 on a NAV of roughly $31.94, which is a trailing yield of about 1.25% — higher than SPUS's 0.39% but well below an income-focused fund. If you want capital growth with a global Shariah-compliant approach and no FX management overhead, WSHR is the right pick. If you specifically want maximum growth potential and are comfortable managing USD, SPUS plus SPWO gives you more upside tilt.

Question: Do I need to purify my returns from halal growth ETFs?

Answer: Yes. Passing the AAOIFI screen does not mean a company earns zero non-permissible income — the Stage 2 test allows up to 5% of total income from non-compliant sources, typically interest on corporate cash balances or other incidental impure revenues. The fraction of your return attributable to that incidental income must be donated to charity (purification). The amount is small for growth ETFs: technology companies earn most of their revenue from products and services, so purification ratios are typically a fraction of a percent of distributions received. SP Funds publishes a quarterly purification calculator at sp-funds.com/purification-calculator covering SPUS (and SPWO). Wahed publishes quarterly HLAL purification reports at wahed.com. If you receive very few distributions from a growth ETF held primarily for capital appreciation, your purification obligation in a given year may be negligible — but the obligation exists even if distributions are reinvested, because AAOIFI methodology requires purifying income regardless of whether it was paid out as dividends.

Question: How does SPWO differ from WSHR for international exposure?

Answer: SPWO and WSHR both provide international halal equity exposure, but their construction is different. SPWO tracks the S&P DM Ex-U.S. and EM 50/50 Shariah Index — a roughly equal blend of developed-market ex-US and emerging-market Shariah-compliant stocks, with Taiwan Semiconductor alone making up 20.86% of the fund as of June 2026. It is US-listed, trades in USD, and charges 0.55%. WSHR tracks the MSCI World Islamic Index, which is dominated by US companies (approximately 70% US weight) with international developed markets making up the remainder — it has minimal emerging-market exposure. WSHR is CAD-listed on Cboe Canada, charges 0.56% MER, and is available directly in Canadian dollars without FX management. The practical rule: if you want dedicated international-ex-US exposure as a complement to a US halal ETF like SPUS, SPWO is the more focused tool. If you want a single global halal equity fund that is simple to buy and hold in CAD, WSHR works for that.

Get expert help with investing

Tell us about your situation and an expert in investing will reach out — free, confidential, and no obligation. The right move often comes down to a few key decisions; we'll help you find them.

Request my free consultation
Back to Blog