RBC InvestEase vs Questwealth Portfolios 2026: Which Robo-Advisor Wins on Fees? ($100K Math)

Quick Answer

Questwealth Portfolios wins on cost: 0.25% management (0.20% above $100,000) plus 0.17%-0.22% ETF MERs, versus RBC InvestEase at 0.50% plus sales tax with 0.11%-0.14% MERs. On $100,000 that is roughly $370-$420 a year at Questwealth versus about $675-$705 at InvestEase in Ontario. InvestEase wins for sub-$250 starts and RBC-ecosystem convenience.

Talk to a CFP — free 15-min call

Sitting at RBC with a six-figure InvestEase balance and wondering whether the fee gap justifies a move? Book a free 15-minute call with our planning team. We will run the fee, tax and transfer math on your actual accounts — no obligation, no product sales.

Key Takeaways

1Ranked by all-in annual cost, Questwealth wins at every balance: roughly 0.37%-0.47% all-in versus RBC InvestEase at 0.61%-0.64% plus sales tax — about $190-$270 a year cheaper on $100,000 before tax, $255-$335 after Ontario HST on RBC's fee
2The fee structures diverge as you grow: Questwealth's management fee drops from 0.25% to 0.20% at $100,000, while InvestEase charges 0.50% on every dollar at every balance — at $250,000 the gap reaches roughly $475-$675 per year
3You are buying different strategies: InvestEase holds passive RBC iShares index portfolios; Questwealth is actively managed, so its returns will deviate from the index — the fee gap is guaranteed, an active edge is not
4Minimums favour InvestEase for tiny starts ($100 invested, no account minimum, Small Balance Portfolio to $1,500) versus Questwealth's $250 — but at any serious balance the minimums are irrelevant and the fee gap dominates
5Nest Wealth is no longer the retail comparison it was — after its 2024 acquisition by Objectway it is a B2B advisor-technology business, so the live 2026 robo matchup is InvestEase vs Questwealth vs Wealthsimple's managed option

The Verdict First: Questwealth on Price, InvestEase on Convenience

Ranked by the only criterion that compounds — all-in annual cost — Questwealth Portfolios beats RBC InvestEase at every balance we tested. On $100,000, Questwealth costs roughly $370-$420 a year (0.20% management fee at that tier plus 0.17%-0.22% in ETF MERs). RBC InvestEase costs roughly $610-$640 before tax (0.50% management fee plus 0.11%-0.14% weighted-average MERs on its standard portfolios) — and RBC bills applicable sales tax on top of its management fee, which adds about $65 a year in Ontario at 13% HST. Call it a $255-$335 annual gap on a six-figure portfolio, every year, for as long as you stay.

That is the headline. The nuance is that the two products are not clones: InvestEase is a passive portfolio of RBC iShares index ETFs with the full weight of the RBC ecosystem behind it, while Questwealth is actively managed by Questrade Wealth Management. If you are an RBC client who values one login, one institution and a $100 starting threshold, InvestEase is a legitimately good product — it is just not the cheap one. Both fee schedules below were pulled from the issuers' own pricing pages in June 2026; robo pricing changes, so re-verify before you fund an account.

Head-to-Head: Every Fee, Minimum and Feature That Matters

Feature	RBC InvestEase	Questwealth Portfolios
Management fee	0.50%/yr + applicable sales tax, at every balance (billed monthly)	0.25% ($250-$99,999); 0.20% ($100,000+) (charged quarterly)
ETF MERs (standard portfolios)	0.11%-0.14% weighted average	0.17%-0.22%
ETF MERs (responsible/SRI portfolios)	0.18%-0.23% weighted average	0.21%-0.35%
All-in cost (standard, before sales tax)	≈0.61%-0.64%	≈0.42%-0.47% (≈0.37%-0.42% above $100K)
Minimum to start investing	$100 (no account minimum; full portfolio at $1,500)	$250
Investment approach	Passive — model portfolios of RBC iShares index ETFs	Active — managers can shift the ETF mix
Transfer-out fee	$150 + sales tax (to non-RBC institutions)	Reimburses incoming transfer fees up to $150/account
Transfer-in reimbursement	Up to $200 on transfers of $15,000+	Up to $150 per account, no minimum
Currency conversion	Portfolios use Canadian-listed ETFs	100 pips (0.01) added to the exchange rate on USD trades
Shariah-screened option	No	No

One structural note before the dollar math: InvestEase's underlying ETFs are actually cheaper than Questwealth's (0.11%-0.14% versus 0.17%-0.22%). RBC loses the comparison anyway because its 0.50% management layer is double Questwealth's — and unlike Questwealth, it never tiers down as your balance grows. The MER difference is a few basis points; the management-fee difference is 25 to 30 basis points, plus tax.

The Fee Math at $25K, $50K, $100K and $250K

Here is what each robo costs per year on its standard portfolios, using each firm's published management fee plus its published ETF MER range. The InvestEase column excludes the sales tax RBC bills on its 0.50% fee — add roughly 13% of the management-fee portion in Ontario (HST), which is about $65 a year on a $100,000 balance.

Balance	RBC InvestEase (0.61%-0.64%)	Questwealth (0.25%/0.20% + MER)	Annual gap
$25,000	$153-$160	$105-$118	$35-$55
$50,000	$305-$320	$210-$235	$70-$110
$100,000	$610-$640	$370-$420	$190-$270
$250,000	$1,525-$1,600	$925-$1,050	$475-$675

The gap is annoying at $25,000 and material at $250,000 — and it compounds. Take the $100,000 case, assume a 5% gross annual return, mid-range fees on each side and Ontario HST on RBC's management fee: after 20 years the Questwealth investor ends with roughly $13,500 more than the InvestEase investor, from the fee difference alone, on identical gross returns. That is the part most people miss about "only" a quarter-point of fees: it is not a one-time charge, it is a permanent drag on a growing base. The same compounding logic is why we tell readers to flee 2%-MER mutual funds in our ETF vs mutual fund comparison — robo-advisors are a milder version of the identical math.

The tier detail that matters at $100K: Questwealth's management fee drops from 0.25% to 0.20% once your balance reaches $100,000 — a built-in loyalty discount. InvestEase has no tiers: the millionth dollar pays the same 0.50% as the first. If your portfolio is on a trajectory from $100K toward $500K, the fee gap is not static; it grows from roughly $255-$335 a year toward $1,275-$1,675 a year (Ontario HST on RBC's fee included). Price the product for the balance you will have, not the balance you have today.

What You Actually Own: Passive RBC iShares vs Active Questwealth

RBC InvestEase is a restricted portfolio manager whose model portfolios hold RBC iShares ETFs — the joint RBC Global Asset Management/BlackRock Canada lineup. You answer a questionnaire, get matched to a standard or responsible-investing portfolio, and the system holds and rebalances index funds. It is the textbook passive robo design, the managed-account cousin of simply buying the funds in our best index funds in Canada ranking yourself.

Questwealth is built differently, and Questrade is upfront about it: the portfolios are actively managed. Its managers can tilt the ETF mix — overweighting or underweighting regions and asset classes — rather than tracking fixed index weights. That cuts both ways. An active tilt can add value in a given year; the long-run evidence across fund categories is that most active management fails to beat its benchmark after fees. Our position: do not pick Questwealth because of the active management. Pick it, if you pick it, because it is the cheapest credible managed portfolio in this matchup — and treat any active outperformance as a bonus you did not pay extra for. Choosing the robo with the guaranteed-lower fee over the one with a hoped-for edge is the same logic as choosing index funds in the first place.

On the fixed-income side, both robos allocate your conservative sleeve to bond ETFs and cash-like holdings. If a chunk of your money has a short timeline — a house down payment, a tuition bill — a managed growth portfolio is the wrong vehicle at either firm; park it instead, and the right parking spot is a deliberate choice between GICs, bonds and high-interest savings or a cash ETF versus a HISA, not a 60/40 robo portfolio.

Minimums, Accounts and Moving Money In and Out

Getting started: InvestEase has no minimum to open; deposits sit in cash until your balance reaches $100, you hold a simplified Small Balance Portfolio from $100 to $1,500, and the full portfolio kicks in at $1,500. Questwealth requires $250 to start investing. Both offer TFSA, RRSP and non-registered accounts; InvestEase also offers the FHSA. Contribution room is set by the CRA, not the platform — $7,000 of new TFSA room in 2026 ($109,000 cumulative since 2009) and a $33,810 RRSP dollar maximum — so the account wrapper question is identical at either firm.

Getting out: this is where the fine print earns its reading. InvestEase charges $150 plus sales tax to transfer your account to a non-RBC institution (withdrawals to cash are free, but cashing out a registered account to move it is almost always the wrong mechanism — direct transfers preserve TFSA room and avoid RRSP withholding). Questrade reimburses incoming transfer fees up to $150 per account with no minimum, which neutralizes most of RBC's exit charge if you switch. In the other direction, InvestEase reimburses up to $200 when you bring in $15,000 or more. Net effect: the exit doors swing both ways at a near-zero toll, which means neither firm can hold your money hostage — so choose on fees and fit, not on fear of being stuck.

Where Nest Wealth Fits in 2026: It Mostly Doesn't

A few years ago this article would have been a three-way comparison. Nest Wealth pioneered flat-subscription robo pricing in Canada and was a genuine InvestEase alternative. It is not anymore: after its 2024 acquisition by Objectway, Nest Wealth's business is advisor- and institution-facing technology — the company describes its platform as built to enhance the efficiency of financial advisors. If you are a retail investor typing "RBC InvestEase vs Nest Wealth" into Google in 2026, the comparison you actually need is the one in this article, with Wealthsimple's managed portfolios as the third live retail option. Subscription-style pricing was always most compelling on very large balances; for the $25K-$250K range where most robo investors live, the percentage-fee matchup above is the decision that matters.

When RBC InvestEase Is Still the Right Call

A verdict is not a blanket rule. InvestEase earns its 0.50% in three specific situations:

You are deep in the RBC ecosystem and value one roof. Same login as your chequing account, instant internal transfers, a Portfolio Advisor team a phone call away, and exclusive-benefit treatment as an existing RBC client. For an investor who would otherwise procrastinate, the friction reduction is worth real money — an extra quarter-point of fees is cheaper than not investing.
You are starting genuinely small. A $100 invested threshold against Questwealth's $250, with no account minimum, makes InvestEase the easier first step for a student or new saver automating small deposits from an RBC chequing account.
You want passive, full stop. If active management is a feature you actively do not want, InvestEase's plain RBC iShares index portfolios are the more philosophically pure managed product in this pair.

What InvestEase is not: a halal option. Neither robo offers Shariah screening — both hold conventional banks, insurers and interest-bearing bonds across their portfolios. Muslim investors need a purpose-built screened product; start with our ranking of the best halal ETFs in Canada for 2026 rather than trying to bend either of these platforms into compliance.

The Third Option Both Robos Hope You Ignore: DIY at a Third of the Cost

The quiet truth about this entire category: a robo-advisor is a convenience wrapper around ETFs you can buy yourself. A single asset-allocation ETF — the XEQT/VEQT style one-fund portfolio — gives you a globally diversified, automatically rebalanced portfolio with no management fee at all, just the fund's own MER — 0.20% in XEQT's case. That dissolves the 0.50%-versus-0.25% management-fee debate entirely: all-in, the DIY route costs roughly a third of InvestEase and about half of Questwealth. The trade-off is real but small: you place the buy orders yourself and you do not get a questionnaire or a phone line. If you can set up a recurring purchase, our XEQT vs VEQT comparison is the next article to read — on a $100,000 balance, the saving from going one-fund DIY is roughly $170-$220 a year against Questwealth and $475-$505 against InvestEase (with Ontario HST), for clicking two buttons a month.

The robo is still the right tool for investors who know they will not follow through on DIY, who want someone to call, or who would tinker destructively with a self-directed account during a crash. Behaviour beats basis points — our robo-advisor vs self-directed breakdown works through who genuinely belongs in each camp. But go in with eyes open: you are paying 0.20% to 0.64% per year for automation and hand-holding, not for access to better investments.

The Bottom Line

Ranked on all-in cost, Questwealth Portfolios beats RBC InvestEase at every balance: roughly 0.42%-0.47% versus 0.61%-0.64% plus sales tax below $100,000, widening at the $100,000 tier where Questwealth drops to 0.20% and InvestEase keeps charging 0.50% on every dollar. On a $100,000 portfolio that is a $255-$335 annual gap in Ontario, compounding to roughly $13,500 over 20 years on identical gross returns. Questwealth's active management is the asterisk — treat it as a quirk you tolerate for the lower fee, not a reason to choose it. InvestEase remains the better fit for RBC-ecosystem loyalists, sub-$250 starters and passive purists who want index-only holdings with a big-bank login. And if you are willing to place your own trades, both lose to a one-fund ETF portfolio at a fraction of the cost. Fee schedules verified June 2026 against both pricing pages — confirm them before you fund, because the numbers in this category move.

Deciding between a robo, DIY, or an advisor?

The right answer changes with your balance, your accounts (TFSA vs RRSP vs non-registered) and whether anyone is actually using the advice you are paying for. Book a free 15-minute call and we will run the all-in cost comparison on your real numbers — no obligation, no product sales.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q:Is Questwealth Portfolios cheaper than RBC InvestEase?

A:Yes, at every balance. Questwealth charges 0.25% on balances from $250 to $99,999 and 0.20% at $100,000 or more, plus ETF MERs of 0.17% to 0.22% on its standard portfolios — an all-in cost of roughly 0.37% to 0.47%. RBC InvestEase charges 0.50% plus applicable sales tax at every balance, plus weighted-average ETF MERs of 0.11% to 0.14% on its standard portfolios — roughly 0.61% to 0.64% before tax. On a $100,000 portfolio that works out to about $370-$420 a year at Questwealth versus roughly $675-$705 at InvestEase once you add Ontario's 13% HST on the management fee. The gap widens with your balance because InvestEase has no fee tier discount: at $250,000 you are paying roughly $475-$675 more per year for the same category of service. Fees were verified against both firms' pricing pages in June 2026 — re-check before opening an account, because robo pricing does change.

Q:What is the minimum to start investing at RBC InvestEase and Questwealth?

A:RBC InvestEase has no minimum to open an account; your deposits sit in cash until the balance reaches $100, at which point you are invested in a Small Balance Portfolio, and the full standard portfolio kicks in at $1,500. Questwealth requires $250 to start investing. In practice both minimums are low enough that they should not drive the decision for anyone investing more than a few hundred dollars. Where the minimum genuinely matters is for someone automating $25 or $50 a paycheque from a standing start — InvestEase gets that money working at $100, and the RBC ecosystem makes the recurring transfer trivially easy if your chequing account is already there.

Q:Does RBC InvestEase or Questwealth have better returns?

A:They are running different strategies, so the honest answer is that future relative performance is unknowable. RBC InvestEase builds its model portfolios entirely from RBC iShares ETFs and runs a conventional passive asset-allocation approach. Questwealth is actively managed — Questrade Wealth Management's portfolio managers can adjust the ETF mix rather than holding fixed index weights, which means returns will deviate from the index in both directions. Decades of fund data show that most active managers fail to beat their benchmark after fees over long horizons, which is why we weight the known, permanent fee gap far more heavily than any past performance difference. The fee difference is contractual and compounds in your favour every single year; an active manager's edge is a hope. Check each provider's published portfolio performance for the trailing numbers, but do not choose a 25-year vehicle on a 3-year scoreboard.

Q:Are robo-advisor management fees tax-deductible in Canada?

A:Only in a non-registered account. Under paragraph 20(1)(bb) of the Income Tax Act, fees paid for investment management and advice on non-registered investments are deductible against income — and Questrade's own pricing page flags this for Questwealth clients. The deduction does not apply to fees on registered accounts (TFSA, RRSP, FHSA, RRIF), and it never applies to the ETF MER, which is embedded inside the fund rather than billed to you. For a higher-income Ontario investor with a large non-registered Questwealth account, the deduction meaningfully trims the net cost of the 0.20-0.25% management fee. RBC InvestEase's 0.50% fee is equally deductible in a non-registered account — it is just a bigger fee to start with.

Q:Can I transfer my RBC InvestEase account to Questwealth without paying fees?

A:Mostly, yes. RBC InvestEase charges $150 plus applicable sales taxes to transfer an account (registered or non-registered) to a non-RBC institution. Questrade reimburses transfer fees charged by your old institution up to $150 per account, with no minimum transfer amount, which covers the bulk of RBC's charge — you may be left paying only the sales tax portion. Going the other direction, RBC InvestEase reimburses up to $200 in transfer fees when you move $15,000 or more from a non-RBC institution. Registered accounts (TFSA, RRSP, FHSA) should always move as a direct institution-to-institution transfer, never a withdrawal-and-recontribution — pulling TFSA money out yourself means waiting until January 1 for the room to come back, and pulling RRSP money out triggers withholding tax and permanently destroys the room.

Q:What happened to Nest Wealth — is it still a robo-advisor option in 2026?

A:Not in any practical retail sense. Nest Wealth was Canada's first subscription-fee robo-advisor and a genuine third option in the late 2010s, but the company's centre of gravity has moved to business-to-business technology: it was acquired by Objectway in 2024, and its platform today is pitched at financial advisors and institutions rather than at retail investors comparison-shopping a robo. If you found this article searching for RBC InvestEase vs Nest Wealth, the live 2026 matchup you actually need to evaluate is InvestEase vs Questwealth (and Wealthsimple's managed offering as the third major retail player). The flat-subscription pricing idea Nest Wealth pioneered remains interesting for very large balances, but it is no longer the head-to-head consumer product it once was.

Q:Can I open a TFSA, RRSP or FHSA at both RBC InvestEase and Questwealth?

A:Yes — both offer TFSA, RRSP and non-registered accounts, and RBC InvestEase also offers the FHSA. Your contribution room is a CRA-level limit that follows you, not the institution: $7,000 of new TFSA room in 2026 ($109,000 cumulative if you have been eligible since 2009) and an RRSP dollar maximum of $33,810 for 2026, regardless of how many institutions you hold accounts at. Splitting one account type across two robos is legal but rarely worth the tracking overhead — the bigger risk is accidentally over-contributing because two platforms are each pulling automatic deposits. Pick one home per account type, and check your remaining room in CRA My Account before setting up automatic contributions.

Q:Is RBC InvestEase or Questwealth halal for Muslim investors?

A:Neither offers a Shariah-screened portfolio. Both build portfolios from broad-market ETFs that hold conventional banks and insurers, which fail the AAOIFI screen on interest-based revenue before you even reach the debt-ratio tests — and both robos' fixed-income allocations are conventional bonds, which are interest-bearing by definition. A Muslim investor cannot fix this by choosing a conservative or socially-responsible option at either firm; SRI screening and Shariah screening are different standards. The practical compliant routes in Canada are Wealthsimple's Shariah-screened managed option or self-directing purpose-built halal ETFs in a brokerage account, with the verdict on any specific fund confirmed against its current holdings and reviewed by a qualified scholar.

Question: Is Questwealth Portfolios cheaper than RBC InvestEase?

Answer: Yes, at every balance. Questwealth charges 0.25% on balances from $250 to $99,999 and 0.20% at $100,000 or more, plus ETF MERs of 0.17% to 0.22% on its standard portfolios — an all-in cost of roughly 0.37% to 0.47%. RBC InvestEase charges 0.50% plus applicable sales tax at every balance, plus weighted-average ETF MERs of 0.11% to 0.14% on its standard portfolios — roughly 0.61% to 0.64% before tax. On a $100,000 portfolio that works out to about $370-$420 a year at Questwealth versus roughly $675-$705 at InvestEase once you add Ontario's 13% HST on the management fee. The gap widens with your balance because InvestEase has no fee tier discount: at $250,000 you are paying roughly $475-$675 more per year for the same category of service. Fees were verified against both firms' pricing pages in June 2026 — re-check before opening an account, because robo pricing does change.

Question: What is the minimum to start investing at RBC InvestEase and Questwealth?

Answer: RBC InvestEase has no minimum to open an account; your deposits sit in cash until the balance reaches $100, at which point you are invested in a Small Balance Portfolio, and the full standard portfolio kicks in at $1,500. Questwealth requires $250 to start investing. In practice both minimums are low enough that they should not drive the decision for anyone investing more than a few hundred dollars. Where the minimum genuinely matters is for someone automating $25 or $50 a paycheque from a standing start — InvestEase gets that money working at $100, and the RBC ecosystem makes the recurring transfer trivially easy if your chequing account is already there.

Question: Does RBC InvestEase or Questwealth have better returns?

Answer: They are running different strategies, so the honest answer is that future relative performance is unknowable. RBC InvestEase builds its model portfolios entirely from RBC iShares ETFs and runs a conventional passive asset-allocation approach. Questwealth is actively managed — Questrade Wealth Management's portfolio managers can adjust the ETF mix rather than holding fixed index weights, which means returns will deviate from the index in both directions. Decades of fund data show that most active managers fail to beat their benchmark after fees over long horizons, which is why we weight the known, permanent fee gap far more heavily than any past performance difference. The fee difference is contractual and compounds in your favour every single year; an active manager's edge is a hope. Check each provider's published portfolio performance for the trailing numbers, but do not choose a 25-year vehicle on a 3-year scoreboard.

Question: Are robo-advisor management fees tax-deductible in Canada?

Answer: Only in a non-registered account. Under paragraph 20(1)(bb) of the Income Tax Act, fees paid for investment management and advice on non-registered investments are deductible against income — and Questrade's own pricing page flags this for Questwealth clients. The deduction does not apply to fees on registered accounts (TFSA, RRSP, FHSA, RRIF), and it never applies to the ETF MER, which is embedded inside the fund rather than billed to you. For a higher-income Ontario investor with a large non-registered Questwealth account, the deduction meaningfully trims the net cost of the 0.20-0.25% management fee. RBC InvestEase's 0.50% fee is equally deductible in a non-registered account — it is just a bigger fee to start with.

Question: Can I transfer my RBC InvestEase account to Questwealth without paying fees?

Answer: Mostly, yes. RBC InvestEase charges $150 plus applicable sales taxes to transfer an account (registered or non-registered) to a non-RBC institution. Questrade reimburses transfer fees charged by your old institution up to $150 per account, with no minimum transfer amount, which covers the bulk of RBC's charge — you may be left paying only the sales tax portion. Going the other direction, RBC InvestEase reimburses up to $200 in transfer fees when you move $15,000 or more from a non-RBC institution. Registered accounts (TFSA, RRSP, FHSA) should always move as a direct institution-to-institution transfer, never a withdrawal-and-recontribution — pulling TFSA money out yourself means waiting until January 1 for the room to come back, and pulling RRSP money out triggers withholding tax and permanently destroys the room.

Question: What happened to Nest Wealth — is it still a robo-advisor option in 2026?

Answer: Not in any practical retail sense. Nest Wealth was Canada's first subscription-fee robo-advisor and a genuine third option in the late 2010s, but the company's centre of gravity has moved to business-to-business technology: it was acquired by Objectway in 2024, and its platform today is pitched at financial advisors and institutions rather than at retail investors comparison-shopping a robo. If you found this article searching for RBC InvestEase vs Nest Wealth, the live 2026 matchup you actually need to evaluate is InvestEase vs Questwealth (and Wealthsimple's managed offering as the third major retail player). The flat-subscription pricing idea Nest Wealth pioneered remains interesting for very large balances, but it is no longer the head-to-head consumer product it once was.

Question: Can I open a TFSA, RRSP or FHSA at both RBC InvestEase and Questwealth?

Answer: Yes — both offer TFSA, RRSP and non-registered accounts, and RBC InvestEase also offers the FHSA. Your contribution room is a CRA-level limit that follows you, not the institution: $7,000 of new TFSA room in 2026 ($109,000 cumulative if you have been eligible since 2009) and an RRSP dollar maximum of $33,810 for 2026, regardless of how many institutions you hold accounts at. Splitting one account type across two robos is legal but rarely worth the tracking overhead — the bigger risk is accidentally over-contributing because two platforms are each pulling automatic deposits. Pick one home per account type, and check your remaining room in CRA My Account before setting up automatic contributions.

Question: Is RBC InvestEase or Questwealth halal for Muslim investors?

Answer: Neither offers a Shariah-screened portfolio. Both build portfolios from broad-market ETFs that hold conventional banks and insurers, which fail the AAOIFI screen on interest-based revenue before you even reach the debt-ratio tests — and both robos' fixed-income allocations are conventional bonds, which are interest-bearing by definition. A Muslim investor cannot fix this by choosing a conservative or socially-responsible option at either firm; SRI screening and Shariah screening are different standards. The practical compliant routes in Canada are Wealthsimple's Shariah-screened managed option or self-directing purpose-built halal ETFs in a brokerage account, with the verdict on any specific fund confirmed against its current holdings and reviewed by a qualified scholar.